Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD YD292XA8AFWOF

Ryzen TR 2920X

▲ 62500 ▼

12 Cores, 24 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2018.

Average Bench: 80.7% (244th of 1468)

Based on 3,902 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00800F82 Model: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 12-Core Processor
Poor: 69%Average: 80.7% Great: 89%
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Popular builds with this CPU

Very good average bench

The AMD Ryzen TR 2920X averaged just 19.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Ryzen TR 2920X near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Multi Core Speed 1,837Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 485Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen TR 2920X is 20.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen TR 2920X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Memory Latency 70.9Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 892Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 3,902 samples)
Rank 24480.7%
Min Avg Max
57 Memory 70.9 84.8
108 1-Core 125 133
207 2-Core 247 264
79.9% 147 Pts
Min Avg Max
400 4-Core 485 525
683 8-Core 892 1,031
82.4% 688 Pts
Min Avg Max
1,345 64-Core 1,837 2,029
114% 1,837 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 259
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 805
81% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,932
120% 1,932 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 847
83% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,998
124% 1,998 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 127
2-Core 257
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 980
87% 739 Pts
64-Core 1,860
115% 1,860 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 77.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 878
82% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,761
109% 1,761 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 64.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 261
81% 152 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 1,022
91% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,979
122% 1,979 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 67.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
81% 151 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 877
83% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,924
119% 1,924 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
77.2% Very good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 938
83% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,820
113% 1,820 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
59.1% Above average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 157
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 480
41% 354 Pts
64-Core 1,659
103% 1,659 Pts
3,902 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 69,050,470 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Ryzen TR 2920X Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 2920XAMDBench 81%, 3,902 samples1x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples48x
RTX 3090Nvidia  $1,350Bench 210%, 158,856 samples37x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia  $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples30x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $116Bench 310%, 455,997 samples39x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $100Bench 297%, 331,647 samples30x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 275%, 495,311 samples20x
RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $88Bench 91%, 87,239 samples13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL  $105Bench 95%, 14,506 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 127% - Outstanding Total price: $441

Popular Ryzen TR 2920X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
10,046

Good (edit your comment) Add link

2 years ago.

AMD are great at selling junk. They pee in the well with fake comments, glorified cheerleaders on youtube and paid magazine reviews. My POS PC still crashes randomly. Everybody needs to call the rats out instead of letting them get away with it.

spacefiddle
Avatar level
6

Excellent

5 years ago.

This was the ultimate niche CPU. At the time of its release, it had an optimal combination of multi-core performance without sacrificing as much single- and quad- as the higher-core CPUs, at an excellent price-point. It utilizes quad-channel RAM. If you were a content creator without external funding, had one machine in the budget, then this chip might even now in mid-2019 be what you're looking for. The higher-end Threadrippers will throw more cores at you... for up to five times the price. If you've a home studio, running a DAW on the same PC you use for everything; or you do your own video editing; or you're an independent streamer; then those extra 12 or 18 cores aren't really going to help you that much anyway, for all that extra cash - AND those CPUs have lower performance in more common applications (single- low-thread apps). Not worth it. Intel isn't even on the table, of course. If you're reading this in the future: these benchmarks have multiple categories for a reason. Read and think. Find the best combination for what you intend to do with it - not some arbitrary "the best" overall. There is no such thing, because you won't be using your computer for Overall, now will you?

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 6 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i3-12100F
vs Intel Core i5-13400F

1468 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback