TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

1st

CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0

▲ 500 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads.
Release date ≤ Q1 2014.

Average Bench: 47.4% (878th of 1452)

Based on 12 user benchmarks.  Device: 1FABFBFF000206D7 Model: 1st CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
Poor: 37%Average: 47.4% Great: 54%
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Below average average bench

The 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 averaged 52.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 59.5Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 203Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 is just 17%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 278Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 247Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 12 samples)
Rank 87847.4%
Min Avg Max
39.3 Memory 59.5 79.6
30.3 1-Core 52 63.5
64.7 2-Core 104 126
43.4% 71.8 Pts
Min Avg Max
74.9 4-Core 203 252
96.9 8-Core 247 482
29% 225 Pts
Min Avg Max
100 64-Core 278 479
17.2% 278 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
51.9% Above average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 115
46% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 482
43% 365 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
51.4% Above average
Memory 56
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 124
47% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 467
43% 360 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
47.8% Average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 121
46% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 331
36% 283 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
45.8% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 24.7
2-Core 75.8
37% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 128
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
44.3% Average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 121
46% 79 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 96.9
24% 158 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
36.6% Below average
Memory 39.3
1-Core 30.7
2-Core 78.4
29% 49.5 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 176
26% 188 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
12 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,019,304 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 10 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i9-13900K
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i7-11700K
vs Intel Core i5-12400

1452 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback