Average Bench: 63.4% (538th of 1456)

Based on 12 user benchmarks.  Device: 1FABFBFF00050654 Model: 1st CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6132 CPU @ 2.60GHz
Poor: 49%Average: 63.4% Great: 73%
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Above average average bench

The 1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6132 averaged 36.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Multi Core Speed 1,405Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 379Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6132 is 24.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6132 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Octa Core Speed 589Pts
Avg. Memory Latency 58.3Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 12 samples)
Min Avg Max
35.1 Memory 58.3 74.2
68.1 1-Core 94.2 106
138 2-Core 188 209
62.1% 114 Pts
Min Avg Max
263 4-Core 379 420
359 8-Core 589 835
59.8% 484 Pts
Min Avg Max
338 64-Core 1,405 3,349
87% 1,405 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 74.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 412
56% 414 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Memory 58.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 209
67% 124 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 825
73% 619 Pts
64-Core 2,400
148% 2,400 Pts
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 50 cores, 50 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Memory 68.7
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 176
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 680
61% 516 Pts
64-Core 3,238
200% 3,238 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 55.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 198
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 831
74% 625 Pts
64-Core 2,134
132% 2,134 Pts
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 61.3
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 182
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 359
49% 362 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
CPU #000, 6 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 46.9
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 195
56% 107 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 753
68% 570 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 48
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 138
47% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 540
47% 402 Pts
64-Core 1,560
96% 1,560 Pts
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 50 cores, 50 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Memory 35.1
1-Core 87
2-Core 155
49% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 676
59% 503 Pts
64-Core 3,349
207% 3,349 Pts
12 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,175,302 CPUs tested

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

1456 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback