TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel

Xeon Silver 4114

▲ 500 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q2 2018.

Average Bench: 51.5% (761st of 1456)

Based on 29 user benchmarks.  Device: 0000000000000000 Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4114 CPU @ 2.20GHz
Poor: 29%Average: 51.5% Great: 63%
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Popular builds with this CPU

Average average bench

The Intel Xeon Silver 4114 averaged 48.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 61.2Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 67.3Pts

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Xeon Silver 4114 is 34.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Xeon Silver 4114 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 414Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 359Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 29 samples)
Rank 76151.5%
Min Avg Max
30.6 Memory 61.2 70.5
24.4 1-Core 67.3 89.7
50.8 2-Core 123 166
49.6% 83.8 Pts
Min Avg Max
63.2 4-Core 232 325
53.6 8-Core 359 626
36.5% 295 Pts
Min Avg Max
67 64-Core 414 1,076
25.6% 414 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
57.1% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 146
56% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 483
45% 373 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
36.6% Below average
Memory 43.2
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 94.6
35% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 281
27% 221 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
29.4% Poor
Memory 30.6
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 93
30% 55 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 167
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
29.2% Poor
Memory 36.5
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 69.8
28% 47.4 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 324
25% 221 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
28.8% Poor
Memory 34.7
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 72.6
28% 47.6 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 245
22% 184 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
27.2% Poor
Memory 37.4
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 58.5
27% 43.3 Pts
4-Core 93.1
8-Core 180
16% 136 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
10.2% Very poor
Memory 12
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 38
13% 23.5 Pts
4-Core 47.6
8-Core 55.1
7% 51.3 Pts
64-Core 43.9
3% 43.9 Pts
29 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,161,412 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Xeon Silver 4114 Builds (Compare 24,555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Xeon Silver 4114IntelBench 52%, 29 samples1x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples1,060x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples458x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples433x
RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples521x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples300x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28

Popular Xeon Silver 4114 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 6 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i7-9700K
vs Intel Core i7-13700K

1456 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback