TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

1st

CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4

▲ 500 ▼

10 Cores, 10 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2017.

Average Bench: 69.7% (413th of 1456)

Based on 10 user benchmarks.  Device: 1FABFBFF000206D2 Model: 1st CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz
Poor: 58%Average: 69.7% Great: 75%
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Above average average bench

The 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 averaged 30.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 70.2Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 382Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 is just 16.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 596Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 574Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 10 samples)
Rank 41369.7%
Min Avg Max
65.7 Memory 70.2 77.9
97.2 1-Core 100 104
157 2-Core 193 206
68% 121 Pts
Min Avg Max
274 4-Core 382 412
356 8-Core 574 821
59.4% 478 Pts
Min Avg Max
380 64-Core 596 1,000
36.9% 596 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
75.5% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 815
73% 614 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
72.1% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 404
52% 391 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
71.9% Very good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 821
72% 614 Pts
64-Core 1,000
62% 1,000 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
70.6% Very good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 201
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 810
70% 600 Pts
64-Core 803
50% 803 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
68.7% Good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 188
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 375
52% 385 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
67.4% Good
Memory 65.7
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 157
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 395
53% 397 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,101,929 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 6 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i7-9700K

1456 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback