Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel

Pentium 3825U

▲ 503 ▼

2 Cores, 4 Threads @1.9 GHz, Broadwell.
Release date ≈ Q3 2015.

Average Bench: 46.8% (910th of 1468)

Based on 3,192 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF000306D4 Model: Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU 3825U @ 1.90GHz
Poor: 29%Average: 46.8% Great: 56%
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Popular builds with this CPU

Below average average bench

The Intel Pentium 3825U averaged 53.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 69.8Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 53.4Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Pentium 3825U is 27%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Pentium 3825U performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 145Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 144Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 3,192 samples)
Rank 91046.8%
Min Avg Max
39.6 Memory 69.8 86.1
27.4 1-Core 53.4 62.1
50.1 2-Core 94 115
46% 72.4 Pts
Min Avg Max
77.3 4-Core 140 163
93.7 8-Core 144 163
18.8% 142 Pts
Min Avg Max
100 64-Core 145 164
9% 145 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
46.3% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 95.6
46% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 132
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
44.2% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 104
46% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 142
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
43.8% Average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 94.4
45% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 130
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
33.7% Below average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 63.7
34% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 86.7
8-Core 98.2
12% 92.4 Pts
64-Core 99.9
6% 99.9 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
30.8% Below average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 47.3
32% 46.6 Pts
4-Core 48.1
8-Core 49.1
6% 48.6 Pts
64-Core 24.2
2% 24.2 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
28.5% Poor
Memory 36.8
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 43
26% 40.1 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 79
15% 102 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
27.6% Poor
Memory 40.2
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 63
31% 50.1 Pts
4-Core 82.4
8-Core 119
13% 101 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
24.8% Poor
Memory 29.9
1-Core 47
2-Core 81.3
30% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 132
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
15.1% Very poor
Memory 23.7
1-Core 24
2-Core 26.9
16% 24.9 Pts
4-Core 37.7
8-Core 40.6
5% 39.2 Pts
64-Core 38.7
2% 38.7 Pts
3,192 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 69,004,022 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Pentium 3825U Builds (Compare 8,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

CPU
Pentium 3825UIntelBench 47%, 3,192 samples1x
GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples2,583x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples1,806x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples1,216x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples254x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $23Bench 56%, 142,801 samples157x
A400 480GBKingston  $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples156x
RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples417x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples393x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples356x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25

Popular Pentium 3825U systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Pentium® Processor 3825U (2M Cache, 1.90 GHz)
Code NameBroadwell
Launch DateQ1'15
Processor Number3825U
# of Cores2
# of Threads4
Cache2 MB
Instruction Set64-bit
Instruction Set ExtensionsSSE4.1/4.2
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Recommended Price$161.00
Clock Speed1.9 GHz
Bus Speed5 GT/s DMI2
Max TDP15 W

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics
Graphics Base Frequency300 MHz
Graphics OutputeDP/DP/HDMI
Wireless DisplayYes
# of Displays Supported3
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency850 MHz
Quick Sync VideoYes
InTru 3D TechYes
Clear Video HD TechNo
Intel InsiderYes
Flexible Display InterfaceYes
Clear Video Tech for MIDYes

Memory

Max Memory Size16 GB
Memory TypesDDR3L 1333/1600 LPDDR3 1333/1600
Memory Channels2
Memory Bandwidth25.6 GB/s

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision2.0
PCI Express Configurations4x1 2x4
Max # of PCI Express Lanes12

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsNo
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechYes
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
TSX-NINo
vPro TechNo
Identity Protection TechYes
Fast Memory AccessYes
Flex Memory AccessYes
Small Business AdvantageNo
Smart Response TechNo

Package

Package Size40mm x 24mm x 1.3mm
Graphics and IMC Lithography14nm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCBGA1168

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardNo
Trusted Execution TechNo

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 9 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i5-12400
vs Intel Core i3-12100F

1468 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback