Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 49.7% (823rd of 1464)

Based on 40 user benchmarks.  Device: 1FABFBFF000206D7 Model: 1st CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz
Poor: 31%Average: 49.7% Great: 59%
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Below average average bench

The 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 averaged 50.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 58.8Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 223Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 is 28.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Octa Core Speed 375Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 49.4Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 40 samples)
Min Avg Max
35.9 Memory 58.8 79.6
26.5 1-Core 49.4 71.3
45.5 2-Core 103 137
42.5% 70.5 Pts
Min Avg Max
94.1 4-Core 223 284
66 8-Core 375 531
36.3% 299 Pts
Min Avg Max
74.5 64-Core 588 1222
36.4% 588 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Memory 74.6
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 108
49% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 366
35% 289 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Memory 66.3
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 124
50% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 496
44% 372 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Memory 63.4
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 124
49% 83 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 492
44% 370 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Memory 65.3
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 116
47% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 444
40% 338 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Memory 58.5
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 125
48% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 503
44% 377 Pts
64-Core 1004
62% 1004 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Memory 61.9
1-Core 51.1
2-Core 104
44% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 358
33% 278 Pts
64-Core 1222
76% 1222 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Memory 46.5
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 66.8
30% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 495
45% 378 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Memory 42.3
1-Core 49.2
2-Core 96
36% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 344
33% 270 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
40 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,780,179 CPUs tested

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

1464 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback