Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 65.5% (506th of 1463)

Based on 16 user benchmarks.  Device: 1FABFBFF000406F1 Model: 1st CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697A v4 @ 2.60GHz
Poor: 55%Average: 65.5% Great: 75%
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Above average average bench

The 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 averaged 34.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 66Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 363Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 is 20.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Octa Core Speed 500Pts
Avg. Multi Core Speed 722Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 16 samples)
Min Avg Max
49.2 Memory 66 77.2
83.5 1-Core 96.4 105
96.7 2-Core 186 210
64.9% 116 Pts
Min Avg Max
222 4-Core 363 419
248 8-Core 500 796
54.5% 432 Pts
Min Avg Max
290 64-Core 722 4,156
44.7% 722 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 71.5
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 202
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 604
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 71.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 711
67% 557 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 77.2
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 185
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 388
49% 373 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 64 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 64.5
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 198
66% 121 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 765
69% 582 Pts
64-Core 4,156
257% 4,156 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 62
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
66% 121 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 756
67% 565 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 72.8
1-Core 93
2-Core 164
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 351
44% 336 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 69.4
1-Core 98
2-Core 194
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 287
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 59.9
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 96.7
51% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 248
38% 274 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
16 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,735,916 CPUs tested

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

1463 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback