TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Snapdragon X1E78100

X Elite 78100

▲ 505 ▼

12 Cores, 12 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q2 2024.

Average Bench: 65.6% (499th of 1456)

Based on 12 user benchmarks.  Device: 0000000000000000 Models: Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E78100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) CPU, Snapdragon® X Elite - X1E78100 - Qualcomm® Oryon™ CPU

These are early user benchmarks for the new Snapdragon ARM-based CPUs for Windows. These tests were run in x86 compatibility mode so it’s fair to assume at least a 20% performance penalty vs. native ARM applications. The results provide an approximate indication of performance for x86 applications running on the new ARM Oryon platform. Compared to the 28-watt Meteor Lake Core Ultra 5 125H, the ARM platform shows improved latency but lags in both single and multi-core performance. [Jun '24 CPUPro]

Poor: 64%Average: 65.6% Great: 67%
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Above average average bench

The Snapdragon X Elite 78100 averaged 34.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 66.9Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 344Pts

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Snapdragon X Elite 78100 is just 2.46%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Snapdragon X Elite 78100 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Single Core Speed 85.2Pts
Avg. Dual Core Speed 172Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 12 samples)
Rank 49965.6%
Min Avg Max
54 Memory 66.9 70.1
82.1 1-Core 85.2 88.4
168 2-Core 172 177
61% 108 Pts
Min Avg Max
343 4-Core 344 354
681 8-Core 688 708
60.8% 516 Pts
Min Avg Max
845 64-Core 982 1,052
60.8% 982 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
67.8% Good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 176
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 703
62% 525 Pts
64-Core 1,037
64% 1,037 Pts
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
66.4% Good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 172
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 688
61% 516 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
66.2% Good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 172
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 686
61% 515 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
66% Good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 170
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 681
60% 512 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
65.9% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 172
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 688
61% 516 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
65.7% Good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 86
2-Core 172
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 687
61% 516 Pts
64-Core 950
59% 950 Pts
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
64.3% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 170
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 682
61% 513 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
59.1% Above average
Memory 54
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 170
57% 103 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 687
61% 515 Pts
64-Core 845
52% 845 Pts
12 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,182,558 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
CPUPro
Avatar level
2,080

Good

17 days ago.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Just released
Age: 1 month

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i7-9700K
vs Intel Core i5-12400

1456 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback