Average Bench: 45% (869th of 1323)

Based on 3,805 user benchmarks.  Devices: 00660F51178BFBFF, 178BFBFF00660F51 Model: AMD FX-9830P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Poor: 32%Average: 45% Great: 55%
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Below average average bench

The AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) averaged 54.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 54.2Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 63.2Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) is 22.7%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 215Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 214Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,805 samples)
Min Avg Max
36.4 Memory 54.2 69.9
33.5 1-Core 63.2 77.5
66.6 2-Core 119 142
46.9% 78.7 Pts
Min Avg Max
108 4-Core 207 261
124 8-Core 214 261
28.6% 211 Pts
Min Avg Max
122 64-Core 215 260
14.4% 215 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Memory 65.7
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 147
58% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 268
37% 269 Pts
64-Core 262
18% 262 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 66.9
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 130
55% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 237
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 232
16% 232 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 69.7
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 40.9
42% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 175
25% 181 Pts
64-Core 195
13% 195 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Memory 70
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 124
53% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 176
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 152
10% 152 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 74.3
1-Core 56.9
2-Core 100
50% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 129
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 168
11% 168 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 56.5
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 114
47% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 188
29% 208 Pts
64-Core 213
14% 213 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Memory 47.4
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 148
50% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 262
36% 261 Pts
64-Core 263
18% 263 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Memory 36.3
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 117
40% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 183
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 209
14% 209 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 31.9
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 96.9
35% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 204
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 217
15% 217 Pts
3,805 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 48,528,343 CPUs tested.

Typical FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550IU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

22 months ago.

i have it......fortnite easy graphics hard


Your
opinion?
1323 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11400F $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback