Average Bench: 54.3% (702nd of 1456)

Based on 73 user benchmarks.  Device: 0F8BFBFF000406F1 Model: 1st CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
Poor: 34%Average: 54.3% Great: 72%
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Average average bench

The 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 averaged 45.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 59Pts
Avg. Dual Core Speed 154Pts

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 is 37.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Octa Core Speed 402Pts
Avg. Multi Core Speed 629Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 73 samples)
Min Avg Max
27 Memory 59 76.2
39 1-Core 74.5 95.2
80.2 2-Core 154 199
54% 95.8 Pts
Min Avg Max
96.2 4-Core 277 376
125 8-Core 402 748
42.3% 339 Pts
Min Avg Max
114 64-Core 629 2,461
38.9% 629 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 56 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 64.4
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 163
59% 104 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 692
61% 516 Pts
64-Core 3,256
202% 3,256 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 59.9
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 169
58% 105 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 708
61% 521 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 51.1
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 177
57% 106 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 697
62% 525 Pts
64-Core 2,000
124% 2,000 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 42 cores, 42 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Memory 52.5
1-Core 82
2-Core 167
55% 101 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 414
48% 371 Pts
64-Core 2,224
138% 2,224 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 59.2
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 120
46% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 334
40% 307 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 47.3
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 84.2
35% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 444
37% 323 Pts
64-Core 2,227
138% 2,227 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 52.1
1-Core 79
2-Core 148
52% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 159
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 63.5
1-Core 11.6
2-Core 20.6
26% 31.9 Pts
4-Core 29.9
8-Core 126
8% 77.9 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
73 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,110,754 CPUs tested

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

1456 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback