Average Bench: 22.7% (1232nd of 1258)

Based on 2,619 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00730F01 Model: AMD E1-6010 APU with AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Poor: 8%Average: 22.7% Great: 31%
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Very poor average bench

The AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics averaged 77.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 39.3Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 19.3Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics is 22.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 37.4Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 37.7Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,619 samples)
Min Avg Max
12.4 Memory 39.3 55.9
9.03 1-Core 19.3 23.1
15.6 2-Core 35.1 45.8
21.8% 31.3 Pts
Min Avg Max
19.8 4-Core 36.5 45.7
21.3 8-Core 37.7 45.8
5.05% 37.1 Pts
Min Avg Max
19.8 64-Core 37.4 45.6
2.5% 37.4 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 53.4
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 27.9
25% 33.2 Pts
4-Core 42.7
8-Core 41.5
6% 42.1 Pts
64-Core 33.1
2% 33.1 Pts
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 51.3
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 45.2
28% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 43.2
8-Core 45.9
6% 44.6 Pts
64-Core 44.4
3% 44.4 Pts
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz
Memory 47.6
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 43.9
26% 38 Pts
4-Core 45.3
8-Core 44.6
6% 44.9 Pts
64-Core 43.1
3% 43.1 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 45.6
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 41.9
26% 36.8 Pts
4-Core 44.1
8-Core 40.9
6% 42.5 Pts
64-Core 36.6
2% 36.6 Pts
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 44.3
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 46.2
26% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 44.8
8-Core 43.3
6% 44 Pts
64-Core 45.5
3% 45.5 Pts
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Memory 43.9
1-Core 16.3
2-Core 31.7
22% 30.6 Pts
4-Core 33.2
8-Core 32.6
4% 32.9 Pts
64-Core 31.9
2% 31.9 Pts
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 30.1
1-Core 20.6
2-Core 29.1
18% 26.6 Pts
4-Core 31.7
8-Core 38
5% 34.8 Pts
64-Core 33.7
2% 33.7 Pts
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 27.3
1-Core 21.4
2-Core 27.7
17% 25.5 Pts
4-Core 37.3
8-Core 34.2
5% 35.8 Pts
64-Core 32.6
2% 32.6 Pts
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 18.7
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 40.7
16% 26.2 Pts
4-Core 35.2
8-Core 40
5% 37.6 Pts
64-Core 33.6
2% 33.6 Pts
2,619 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 31,796,699 CPUs tested.

Typical E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $32

Popular E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

1258 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-9400F $151Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $335Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback