TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)

▲ 5148 ▼

4 Cores, 4 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2015.

Average Bench: 29.4% (1348th of 1452)

Based on 5,170 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00730F01, 00730F01178BFBFF Model: AMD E2-7110 APU with AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Poor: 18%Average: 29.4% Great: 35%
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Popular builds with this CPU

Very poor average bench

The AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) averaged 70.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 43Pts
Avg. Dual Core Speed 51Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) is just 17.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 96.3Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 95.4Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 5,170 samples)
Rank 134829.4%
Min Avg Max
23.8 Memory 43 53.1
19 1-Core 25.5 27.6
37.8 2-Core 51 55.3
25.9% 39.8 Pts
Min Avg Max
60.8 4-Core 92.5 109
65.5 8-Core 95.4 109
12.5% 93.9 Pts
Min Avg Max
69.9 64-Core 96.3 109
6% 96.3 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
33.7% Below average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 6.6
2-Core 11.1
23% 26.5 Pts
4-Core 37
8-Core 34.4
5% 35.7 Pts
64-Core 20.4
1% 20.4 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
26.1% Poor
Memory 35.7
1-Core 26.3
2-Core 53
24% 38.3 Pts
4-Core 96.4
8-Core 95.3
13% 95.9 Pts
64-Core 90.6
6% 90.6 Pts
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
25% Poor
Memory 35.3
1-Core 26.1
2-Core 52.6
24% 38 Pts
4-Core 85.6
8-Core 89.2
12% 87.4 Pts
64-Core 87.7
5% 87.7 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
23.8% Poor
Memory 31.7
1-Core 23.8
2-Core 48.9
22% 34.8 Pts
4-Core 92.3
8-Core 91.4
12% 91.9 Pts
64-Core 96.9
6% 96.9 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
23.2% Poor
Memory 30.5
1-Core 25.9
2-Core 51.9
22% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 93
8-Core 91.9
12% 92.4 Pts
64-Core 92.5
6% 92.5 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
21.3% Poor
Memory 32.9
1-Core 19.8
2-Core 38
20% 30.2 Pts
4-Core 56.7
8-Core 63.1
8% 59.9 Pts
64-Core 69.1
4% 69.1 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
19.2% Very poor
Memory 22.9
1-Core 26.4
2-Core 52.8
20% 34 Pts
4-Core 90
8-Core 90.6
12% 90.3 Pts
64-Core 90.2
6% 90.2 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
18.7% Very poor
Memory 31.2
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 29.1
18% 25.8 Pts
4-Core 35.8
8-Core 42.3
5% 39 Pts
64-Core 42
3% 42 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
11.8% Very poor
Memory 12.8
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 45.6
15% 27.2 Pts
4-Core 61.2
8-Core 68
8% 64.6 Pts
64-Core 72.8
4% 72.8 Pts
5,170 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,079,714 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) Builds (Compare 7,875 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

CPU
E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 29%, 5,170 samples1x
GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples2,523x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples1,759x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples1,188x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples250x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples155x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples151x
RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples403x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples380x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples350x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28

Popular E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,870

Good (edit your comment) Add link

21 months ago.

We all know why you're here. You got scammed out of buying a decent computer a few years back when you didn't know anything about computers. Now you're curious as to just how bad it really is. Spoiler alert: Cheapest new CPU I could find has over 100% increases in every category. Ouch.

JPN-User
Avatar level
3,416

Average

4 years ago.

マイクラの最新バージョンをすると重いからです。

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i9-13900K
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i7-11700K
vs Intel Core i5-12400

1452 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback