Average Bench: 31.3% (1200th of 1316)

Based on 4,085 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00730F01, 00730F01178BFBFF Model: AMD E2-7110 APU with AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Poor: 21%Average: 31.3% Great: 36%
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Poor average bench

The AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) averaged 68.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 44.5Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 28.9Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) is just 15.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 109Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 108Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 4,085 samples)
Min Avg Max
27.3 Memory 44.5 53.2
22.1 1-Core 28.9 31
42.8 2-Core 57.9 62.1
28.4% 43.8 Pts
Min Avg Max
66.1 4-Core 106 123
75.9 8-Core 108 123
14.5% 107 Pts
Min Avg Max
74.2 64-Core 109 124
7.3% 109 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Memory 45.7
1-Core 19.6
2-Core 60.7
27% 42 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 122
17% 123 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 47.9
1-Core 30.2
2-Core 60.3
30% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 101
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 95.3
6% 95.3 Pts
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Memory 38.1
1-Core 30.7
2-Core 61.7
27% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 117
16% 116 Pts
64-Core 112
8% 112 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 37.1
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 61.4
27% 43 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 121
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Memory 36.9
1-Core 29.3
2-Core 56.9
26% 41 Pts
4-Core 95.8
8-Core 111
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 37.7
1-Core 28.7
2-Core 46.8
25% 37.7 Pts
4-Core 74.2
8-Core 104
12% 88.9 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 26.5
1-Core 16.5
2-Core 29.9
16% 24.3 Pts
4-Core 45.9
8-Core 38.6
6% 42.2 Pts
64-Core 41.4
3% 41.4 Pts
4,085 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 44,091,257 CPUs tested.

Typical E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) Builds (Compare 15,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $35

Popular E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

2 months ago.

We all know why you're here. You got scammed out of buying a decent computer a few years back when you didn't know anything about computers. Now you're curious as to just how bad it really is. Spoiler alert: Cheapest new CPU I could find has over 100% increases in every category. Ouch.


Average

13 months ago.

マイクラの最新バージョンをすると重いからです。


Your
opinion?
1316 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback