Average Bench: 89.2% (148th of 1456)

Based on 9 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF00050657 Model: 1st CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8252C CPU @ 3.80GHz
Poor: 76%Average: 89.2% Great: 94%
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Very good average bench

The 1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C averaged just 10.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Multi Core Speed 3,950Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 549Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C is just 18.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the 1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Memory Latency 75.8Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 1,053Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 9 samples)
Min Avg Max
52.6 Memory 75.8 81.6
134 1-Core 140 144
263 2-Core 279 288
88.7% 165 Pts
Min Avg Max
526 4-Core 549 575
904 8-Core 1,053 1,155
95.2% 801 Pts
Min Avg Max
1,911 64-Core 3,950 4,359
244% 3,950 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 81.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1072
98% 823 Pts
64-Core 4,318
267% 4,318 Pts
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 81.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 275
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 1,103
98% 828 Pts
64-Core 4,171
258% 4,171 Pts
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 81.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 1,155
100% 852 Pts
64-Core 4,359
270% 4,359 Pts
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Memory 74.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,036
97% 806 Pts
64-Core 4,248
263% 4,248 Pts
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 76.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 1,069
96% 808 Pts
64-Core 4,206
260% 4,206 Pts
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Memory 79.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 1,013
91% 770 Pts
64-Core 4,252
263% 4,252 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 74.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 1,056
95% 803 Pts
64-Core 4,233
262% 4,233 Pts
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Memory 52.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 263
78% 150 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 1,064
94% 798 Pts
64-Core 3,850
238% 3,850 Pts

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,134,989 CPUs tested

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

1456 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback