TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

1st

CPU: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core

▲ 500 ▼

32 Cores, 32 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2020.

Average Bench: 75% (307th of 1445)

Based on 9 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00830F10 Model: 1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core Processor
Poor: 62%Average: 75% Great: 83%
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO

Popular builds with this CPU

Good average bench

The 1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core averaged 25.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Multi Core Speed 4,097Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 527Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the 1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core is 21.7%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the 1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Memory Latency 52.5Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 942Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 9 samples)
Rank 30775%
Min Avg Max
35.6 Memory 52.5 63.5
60.9 1-Core 125 137
122 2-Core 251 274
74.2% 143 Pts
Min Avg Max
487 4-Core 527 550
525 8-Core 942 1099
88.4% 734 Pts
Min Avg Max
513 64-Core 4,097 5,637
254% 4,097 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 63.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
83% 158 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 1099
97% 825 Pts
64-Core 5,562
344% 5,562 Pts
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 62.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 265
81% 153 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 1,047
93% 789 Pts
64-Core 5,637
349% 5,637 Pts
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
80% Very good
Memory 60.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 266
80% 153 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 1,062
94% 797 Pts
64-Core 5,599
346% 5,599 Pts
CPU1, 4 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
79.5% Very good
Memory 60.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 269
81% 155 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 1,030
92% 778 Pts
64-Core 5,354
331% 5,354 Pts
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
79% Very good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 260
79% 150 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 1,045
92% 783 Pts
64-Core 4,000
248% 4,000 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
73.7% Very good
Memory 55.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
79% 151 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 530
71% 530 Pts
64-Core 526
33% 526 Pts
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
68.8% Good
Memory 37.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
73% 146 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 1,070
94% 801 Pts
64-Core 5,587
346% 5,587 Pts
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
68% Good
Memory 35.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
73% 146 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 1,068
94% 801 Pts
64-Core 4,096
254% 4,096 Pts
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
61.6% Good
Memory 37.2
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 122
40% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 525
67% 506 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,909,693 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CPU: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core Builds (Compare 727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: Supermicro Super Server

CPU
CPU: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core1stBench 75%, 9 samples1x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples22x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples20x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples20x
860 Pro 512GBSamsung  $150Bench 110%, 16,934 samples18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples13x
RAM
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples12x
18ADF2G72AZ-2G3B1 2x16GBMicronBench 76%, 43 samples10x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 8x16GBMicronBench 114%, 326 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $453

Popular CPU: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i3-12100F
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs Intel Core i9-13900K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i7-11700K

1445 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback