Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 77.3% (292nd of 1468)

Based on 20 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF00050657 Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) W-3275M CPU @ 2.50GHz
Poor: 71%Average: 77.3% Great: 89%
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

Good average bench

The Intel Xeon W-3275M averaged 22.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Intel Xeon W-3275M near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Multi Core Speed 3,549Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 119Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Xeon W-3275M is just 17.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Xeon W-3275M performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Octa Core Speed 834Pts
Avg. Memory Latency 75.5Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 20 samples)
Min Avg Max
61.3 Memory 75.5 85.7
96.3 1-Core 119 144
192 2-Core 233 282
78.6% 142 Pts
Min Avg Max
363 4-Core 424 534
733 8-Core 834 1,013
74.4% 629 Pts
Min Avg Max
1,755 64-Core 3,549 3938
220% 3,549 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 78.2
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 195
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 782
69% 586 Pts
64-Core 3,726
231% 3,726 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 77.6
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 194
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 771
68% 579 Pts
64-Core 3,585
222% 3,585 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 75.3
1-Core 98
2-Core 196
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 781
69% 586 Pts
64-Core 3,737
231% 3,737 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 73.9
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 192
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 764
68% 574 Pts
64-Core 3,665
227% 3,665 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 77.3
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 196
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 744
65% 554 Pts
64-Core 3,610
223% 3,610 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 69.3
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 195
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 781
69% 585 Pts
64-Core 3,551
220% 3,551 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 61.3
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 194
64% 117 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 770
68% 579 Pts
64-Core 3,492
216% 3,492 Pts
20 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,967,813 CPUs tested

Typical Xeon W-3275M Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $100

Popular Xeon W-3275M systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Xeon® W-3275M Processor
Launch DateQ2'19
Processor NumberW-3275M
# of Cores28
# of Threads56
Cache38.5 MB
Instruction Set ExtensionsIntel® AVX-512
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Clock Speed2.50 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency4.40 GHz
Bus Speed8 GT/s
Scalability1S Only
Max TDP205 W
Product BriefView now

Memory

Max Memory Size2 TB
Memory TypesDDR4-2933
Memory Channels6
ECC Memory SupportedYes

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision3
Max # of PCI Express Lanes64

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes

Advanced Technologies

Turbo Boost 3.0 TechYes
Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Turbo Boost Tech2
Hyper-Threading TechYes
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
Speed Shift TechnologyYes

Package

Package Size76.0mm x 56.5mm
Sockets SupportedFCLGA3647

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
Trusted Execution TechYes

 Comments

1468 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback