Intel
IntelBX80671I76800K
  

8 Cores, 16 Threads @2.6 GHz, Ivy Bridge EP.
Release date ≈ Q1 2015.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.4GHz, Broadwell-E.
Release date: Q2 2016.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 55,319 user samples
5,123 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Base clock 2.6 GHz
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 461st / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
50,196 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 90% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 71% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 71% Great: 90%
SPEED RANK: 228th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
67.4 % 80.9 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79.2 Pts 86 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+9%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
73 Pts 107 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+47%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
148 Pts 214 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+45%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
300 Pts 408 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+36%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
549 Pts 660 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+20%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.7 Pts 94.9 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
87.2 Pts 124 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+42%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
172 Pts 248 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+44%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
326 Pts 483 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+48%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
636 Pts 770 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+21%
Market Share
Based on 67,983,634 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % 0.06 % Hugely higher market share.
+200%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % 65 % More popular.
+25%
Age
Newest
111+ Months 96 Months More recent.
+14%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
830 Pts 956 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+15%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
772 Pts 827 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+7%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'13 Q2'16
Cache
Cache
20 MB SmartCache 15 MB
Lithography
Lithography
22 nm 14 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$1166.00 - $1171.00 N/A
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz 3.8 GHz
Scalability
Scalability
2S Only 1S Only
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
768 GB 128 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600/1866 DDR4 2400/2133
ECC Memory Supported
ECC Memory Supported ‡
Yes No
Max CPU Configuration
Max CPU Configuration
2 1
vPro Tech
Intel® vPro™ Technology ‡
Yes No
Trusted Execution Tech
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡
Yes No
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
40 28

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

cheap, reliable, powerful, it has, like we say in Spain, the three B: Bueno Bonito Barato (good, beautiful, cheap) [Dec '19 janderklander75]

MORE DETAILS

The Core i7-6800K is the weakest of four new 14 nm Broadwell-E prosumer CPUs. This model has six cores with base and turbo frequencies of 3.4 and 3.8 GHz, a TDP of 140 watts and 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes. The 6800K closely matches, and supersedes, the very popular Haswell-E 5820K. Because of its MSRP of around $500, this CPU only makes sense for niche use cases which include graphics design, video production or multi GPU gaming. Comparing the 6800K and 6700K shows that for typical desktop use, at stock clocks, the 6800K actually lags the 6700K by around 10%. This is because desktop computing largely depends on single core performance and the Skylake i7-6700K is both clocked higher (Base clock 4.0 GHz vs 3.4 GHz) and has higher IPC due to its one generation lead over the 6800K. If the 6800K proves to be a capable overclocker then it may challenge the 6700K on a range of core-heavy use cases, time will tell. [Jun '16 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback