Intel
IntelBX80637I33225
  

2 Cores, 2 Threads @2.6 GHz, Haswell.
Release date ≈ Q2 2014.

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.3GHz, Ivy Bridge.
Release date: Q3 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 4,394 user samples
1,049 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 36% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 36% Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 834th / 1459
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
3,345 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 619th / 1459
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
49.2 % 58.5 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.4 Pts 80.9 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
68.4 Pts 82.7 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+21%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
128 Pts 145 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+13%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
130 Pts 211 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+62%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
133 Pts 214 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+61%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
86.8 Pts 93.3 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
77 Pts 91.8 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+19%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
152 Pts 173 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+14%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
150 Pts 232 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+55%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
151 Pts 232 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+54%
Market Share
Based on 68,300,425 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
50 % 51 % +2%
Age
Newest
121+ Months More recent.
+15%
143 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
151 Pts 233 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+54%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
133 Pts 215 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+62%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'13 Q3'12
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$64.00 $134.00
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
5 GT/s DMI2 5 GT/s DMI
Thermal Solution Specification
Thermal Solution Specification
PCG 2013A 2011C
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V DDR3 1333/1600
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
21.3 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
ECC Memory Supported
ECC Memory Supported ‡
Yes No
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
200 MHz 650 MHz
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1.1 GHz 1.05 GHz
Clear Video HD Tech
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
No Yes
Hyper-Threading Tech
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡
No Yes
Secure Key
Secure Key
Yes No
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
Up to 3.0 2.0
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Core i3-3225 Ivy Bridge processor offers both superb real world performance and excellent value for money. For raw single threaded performance the i3-3225 scores 28% lower than the i7-3770K but costs less than half as much. At first glance one might assume that I am crazy for recommending a puny Core-i3 over the mighty Core-i7's but for real world consumer use there is simply no point in having 4 cores and 8 threads, they will hardly ever be used. All of the third gen Ivy Bridge Core-i3s are superb but the i3-3225 sports the slightly more 3D capable HD 4000 Graphics vs the HD 2500 offered on the other models. For real-world performance in an energy efficient package with modest on-board graphics, this is a superb choice. For most use cases including: email, surfing, watching movies, listening to music and office apps, this processor will deliver almost as good an experience as any other processor on the market. [Jun '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $156
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback