Today's hottest deals
IntelBX80646G3220
Intel

2 Cores, 2 Threads @3.0GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q3 2013.

  

2 Cores, 2 Threads @2.9 GHz, Skylake.
Release date ≈ Q1 2016.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 19,529 user samples
19,337 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 31% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 31% Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 870th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
192 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 36% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 36% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 722nd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
48.3 % 53.8 % Faster effective speed.
+12%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
73.1 Pts 79.5 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+9%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
74.4 Pts 86.8 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+17%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
133 Pts 162 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+22%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
138 Pts 165 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+20%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
141 Pts 170 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+21%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
90.1 Pts 93.5 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
85.4 Pts 94.2 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+10%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
170 Pts 188 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+11%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
169 Pts 187 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+11%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
169 Pts 188 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+11%
Market Share
Based on 68,929,107 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
50 %
Age
Newest
134 Months 103+ Months More recent.
+23%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
169 Pts 189 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+12%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
140 Pts 168 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+20%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'13 Q4'15
Cache
Cache
3 MB SmartCache 2 MB SmartCache
Lithography
Lithography
22 nm 14 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$54.00 - $64.00 $52.00
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
5 GT/s DMI2 8 GT/s DMI3
Thermal Solution Specification
Thermal Solution Specification
PCG 2013C PCG 2015C (65W)
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
32 GB 64 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
21.3 GB/s 34.1 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 510
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI/VGA eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1.1 GHz 950 MHz
Clear Video HD Tech
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
No Yes
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Video Max Memory
1.7 GB 64 GB
Graphics and IMC Lithography
Graphics and IMC Lithography
22 nm 14 nm
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
No Yes
AES New Instructions
Intel® AES New Instructions
No Yes
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
Up to 3.0 3.0

More specs » More specs »

The G3220 is a 2013 Haswell based CPU and is part of Intel's value range of Pentium processors which were launched in 2011. The Pentium-G range have very strong single and dual core performance but lag far behind the group leaders in terms of multi-core processing (MCP). MCP is important for tasks such as audio/video encoding, or software development. For regular PC use such as surfing the web, listening to music, watching movies and playing the vast majority of games, MCP is not required. The G3220 currently retails for one sixth of the price of a top of the range 4770K but has an effective speed of 75.3 which is just 12% lower than the average of the current group leaders. The vast majority of users will notice no difference even by paying five times more for one of the top end multi-core processors. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback