COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80601920
AMD100-100001277WOF
▲ 542,512 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.66GHz, Nehalem.
Release date: Q3 2008.

VS
▲ 52212 ▼

16 Cores, 32 Threads @4.3GHz, Zen5.
Release date: Q3 2024.

Effective Speed 
+92%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 69,172 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
69,074 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 46% Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 46% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 580th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
98 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 133% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 101% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 133%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		61.6 % 118 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+92%
Average Score 
+248%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		84.9 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8% 		78.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		64.7 Pts 229 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+254%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		124 Pts 448 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+261%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		211 Pts 840 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+298%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		298 Pts 1,598 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+436%
Overclocked Score 
+201%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		94.7 Pts +4% 90.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		84.8 Pts 243 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+187%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		161 Pts 486 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+202%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		279 Pts 949 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+240%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		388 Pts 1,856 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+378%
Value & Sentiment 
+121%
Market Share
Based on 68,990,435 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.05 % Hugely higher market share.
+400% 		0.01 %
Value
Value For Money 		83.9 % 90.8 % Slightly better value.
+8%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		54 % +4% 52 %
Price
Price (score) 		$90 Hugely cheaper.
+87% 		$719
Nice To Haves 
+366%
Age
Newest 		194 Months 2 Months Hugely more recent.
+99%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		130 Watts More energy efficient.
+24% 		170 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+300%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+300%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		45 nm 4 nm Hugely newer manufacturing.
+91%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		2.66 GHz 4.3 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+62%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		2.93 GHz 5.7 GHz Hugely faster turbo frequency.
+95%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		399 Pts 4,733 Pts Insanely faster OC 64-core speed.
+1,086%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		306 Pts 4,240 Pts Insanely faster 64-core speed.
+1,286%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Nehalem Zen5
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		LGA1366 AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None RDNA2
Conclusion 
Average Bench 61.6%
Average Bench 118%

The Intel Core i7-920 is five and a half years old which puts it at an enormous disadvantage to more modern processors. The 920 sports four cores and eight threads which is the same basic configuration that Intel still uses in the majority of their i7s. Comparing the 920 to the 4770K, its modern day equivalent, shows that 920 lags by 63% at stock speeds and by 44% when both processors are overclocked. Overclocking improves the 920 by 30% vs just 17% for the 4770K. Aside from approximately 50% more calculation throughput the 4770K offers lower power consumption, compatibility with Intel's latest FCLGA1150 platform, on-board graphics and newer CPU instructions. Owners of the 920 should probably consider upgrading not only to improve system response times but also to take advantage of the newer platform. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9000 CPUs have the same integrated graphics, PCIe lanes, USB support and DRAM controller as the Ryzen 7000 series. The only difference is improved cores which have moved from TSMC's 5 nm process to 4 nm. The new cores offer 15% more performance under cherry-picked conditions but for latency-sensitive workloads, like gaming, they are just few percent faster. The 9600X, 9700X, 9900X, and 9950X are priced at $280, $360, $500, and $650, respectively, making them $80-$200 USD more expensive than the 7000 series. Since the 7000 series flopped (7800X3D somewhat excluded) due to unrealistic pricing, slow boot times, high platform costs and windows gamebar requirements etc., the 9000 series is more or less DOA. When the 9000X3D variants launch (expected in early 2025) gamers who play cache sensitive games such as SoTTR or Factorio with a 4090 and don’t mind frame drops, may find value in the 9800X3D. Meanwhile, Intel’s 12th and 13th gen CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. Furthermore, Intel is scheduled to launch Arrow-Lake (est. +10% performance vs 14th gen) and Lunar-Lake (snapdragon competitive x86 battery life) this year, but they face serious challenges due to reliance on marketers who are mostly funded by AMD. Even if Arrow and Lunar Lake deliver stellar performance, without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Aug '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
69,074
98
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback