Intel
IntelCW8064701470702
  

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.10 GHz, Kaby Lake G.
Release date ≈ Q1 2018.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.4GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q1 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 75,525 user samples
5,922 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 52% Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 52% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 359th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
69,603 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 32% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 32% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 609th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
72.5 % Faster effective speed.
+24%
58.6 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81.9 Pts Lower memory latency.
+12%
72.9 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
103 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+34%
76.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
195 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+34%
145 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
343 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+41%
243 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
516 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+48%
349 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.1 Pts +5% 88 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
124 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+34%
92.5 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
236 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+30%
181 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
431 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+37%
314 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
620 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+32%
470 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,066,953 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.32 % Hugely higher market share.
+540%
0.05 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 55 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Age
Newest
75+ Months Much more recent.
+44%
135 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
619 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+32%
470 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
519 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+45%
357 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q1'18 Q2'13
Cache
Cache
8 MB 6 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Lithography
Lithography
14 nm 22 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
N/A $378.00
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
4.10 GHz 3.4 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
8 GT/s DMI 5 GT/s DMI2
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
64 GB 32 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR4-2400 DDR3L 1333/1600
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
37.5 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 630 Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
350 MHz 400 MHz
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP 1.4, DP 1.2, HDMI 1.4, DVI eDP/DP/HDMI/VGA
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1.10 GHz 1.15 GHz
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Video Max Memory
64 GB 2 GB
Package Size
Package Size
31mm x 58.5mm 37.5mm x 32mm x 1.6mm
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
Yes No
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
3.0 3
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
Up to 1x8, 2x4 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
8 16

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i7-4700MQ is a high end mobile Haswell (2013) CPU. Despite sporting base and turbo clock speeds of 2.4/3.4 GHz, the 4700MQ has a maximum TDP of just 47 Watts. Although the 4700MQ is a quad core processor, hyperthreading technology allows the operation of eight virtual cores which enable the 4700MQ to deal with multi-core workloads with ease. The overall effective speed rating for the 4700MQ is 85.5 which is just 12% slower than the average of the current 9 group leaders. Since the group leaders include both desktop and server models this is a particularly impressive score for mobile processor with a TDP of just 47 Watts - it's almost as good as a reasonable desktop. [Oct '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback