COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80671I76800K
AMDFD9370FHHKWOF
▲ 659,591 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.4GHz, Broadwell-E.
Release date: Q2 2016.

VS
▲ 532,352 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2013.

Effective Speed 
+29%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 59,250 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
50,196 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 90% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 71% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 71% Great: 90%
SPEED RANK: 221st / 1445
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
9,054 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Base clock 5 GHz
Worst Bench: 55% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 55% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 542nd / 1445
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		80.9 % Faster effective speed.
+29% 		62.5 %
Average Score 
+56%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		86 Pts +4% 82.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		107 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+58% 		67.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		214 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+67% 		128 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		408 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+76% 		232 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		660 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+74% 		380 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+47%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		94.9 Pts +3% 92.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		124 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+51% 		82.2 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		248 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+57% 		158 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		483 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+67% 		290 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		770 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+60% 		481 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 67,930,583 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.05 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
Value
Value For Money 		105 % Much better value.
+52% 		69 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		65 % More popular.
+23% 		53 %
Price
Price (score) 		$107 Much cheaper.
+45% 		$194
Nice To Haves 
+33%
Age
Newest 		95 Months More recent.
+27% 		130 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		140 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+36% 		220 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50% 		8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.4 GHz 4.4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+29%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.8 GHz 4.7 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+24%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		956 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+98% 		482 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		827 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+114% 		386 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Broadwell-E Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		LGA2011-V3 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 80.9%
Average Bench 62.5%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Core i7-6800K is the weakest of four new 14 nm Broadwell-E prosumer CPUs. This model has six cores with base and turbo frequencies of 3.4 and 3.8 GHz, a TDP of 140 watts and 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes. The 6800K closely matches, and supersedes, the very popular Haswell-E 5820K. Because of its MSRP of around $500, this CPU only makes sense for niche use cases which include graphics design, video production or multi GPU gaming. Comparing the 6800K and 6700K shows that for typical desktop use, at stock clocks, the 6800K actually lags the 6700K by around 10%. This is because desktop computing largely depends on single core performance and the Skylake i7-6700K is both clocked higher (Base clock 4.0 GHz vs 3.4 GHz) and has higher IPC due to its one generation lead over the 6800K. If the 6800K proves to be a capable overclocker then it may challenge the 6700K on a range of core-heavy use cases, time will tell. [Jun '16 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-9370 is the slightly lower clocked (4.4 GHz) version of AMD's flagship FX-9 range of desktop processors. The FX-9590 comes clocked at 4.7 GHz with a staggering turbo clock of 5 GHz. Comparing the 9370 and 9590 versions shows that there is only 3% between the two processors at stock clocks but when overclocked they both have an identical performance profile. Given that the 9590 costs nearly 25% more the 9370 should be the obvious choice. Both of these processors have superb multi-core performance but they both lag Intel when it comes to single and dual-core workloads. Until AMD can improve single core performance they will continue to struggle in the high end PC market. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
50,196
9,054
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback