Intel
IntelCM8067703016117

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.2GHz, Sandy Bridge.
Release date: Q3 2011.

  

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.90 GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date ≈ Q2 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 51,637 user samples
51,169 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 31% Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 652nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
468 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 41% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 41% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 579th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
56.3 % 60.2 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.2 Pts 81 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
63.4 Pts 84 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+32%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
120 Pts 149 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+24%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
201 Pts 229 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+14%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
279 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+20%
233 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.9 Pts 91.8 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
79.3 Pts 92.4 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+17%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
153 Pts 176 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+15%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
276 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+7%
257 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
370 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+44%
257 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,766,841 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.05 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
55 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
51 %
Age
Newest
151 Months 82+ Months Much more recent.
+46%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
371 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+44%
258 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
281 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+20%
234 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q4'11 Q1'17
Cache
Cache
6 MB SmartCache 3 MB
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
AVX SSE4.1/4.2
Lithography
Lithography
32 nm 14 nm
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
5 GT/s DMI 8 GT/s DMI3
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
32 GB 64 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3 1066/1333 DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 3000 Intel® HD Graphics 610
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
650 MHz 350.00 MHz
# of Displays Supported
# of Displays Supported ‡
2 3
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1.1 GHz 1.05 GHz
Package Size
Package Size
37.5mm x 37.5 (rPGA998) 37.5mm x 37.5mm
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
2.0 3.0
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i7-2370QM is a 2009 Sandy Bridge laptop CPU. With four physical cores and eight threads the 2370QM is able to handle single, dual and multi-core workloads equally well. Comparing the 2670QM and the 3630QM, its Ivy Bridge counterpart, shows that the newer Ivy Bridge processor is approximately 30% faster, has the same TDP (45 Watts) and shares a common socket (FCPGA988) with the 2370QM. An interesting comparison is between the 2670QM and the 2600K, these processors share the same micro-architecture (Sandy Bridge) yet the desktop 2600K is over 50% faster. The gap between Laptop and Desktop processors has been significantly narrowed in newer generations. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback