Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8071514700K
AMD100-100000023BOX

20 Cores, 28 Threads @3.4GHz, Raptor Lake.
Release date: Q4 2023.

12 Cores, 24 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 204,195 user samples
6,853 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 134% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.6 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 125% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 125% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 6th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
197,342 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 173rd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
130 % Much faster effective speed.
+47%
87.9 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
86.6 Pts Lower memory latency.
+15%
75 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
230 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+65%
139 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
461 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+68%
275 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
920 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+71%
539 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1781 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+73%
1030 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
93.3 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
87.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
237 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+60%
148 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
472 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+60%
295 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
940 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+63%
577 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1870 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+66%
1128 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,928,838 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.96 % Hugely higher market share.
+317%
0.23 %
Value
Value For Money
122 % Much better value.
+45%
84.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
94 % More popular.
+29%
73 %
Price
Price (score)
$347 $325 Slightly cheaper.
+6%
Age
Newest
12 Months Hugely more recent.
+81%
63 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 105 Watts More energy efficient.
+16%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
20 cores Much higher core count.
+67%
12 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
28 threads Higher thread count.
+17%
24 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
10 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+30%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz 3.8 GHz Faster base frequency.
+12%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+22%
4.6 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
3891 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+75%
2224 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
3708 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+82%
2036 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Raptor Lake Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1700 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 770 None

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback