Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8070110700F
IntelBX8070811900K

8 Cores, 16 Threads @2.90 GHz, 65 W.
Release date ≈ Q2 2020.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.5GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
284 EFps 306 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+8%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
106 EFps 109 EFps +3%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
139 EFps 146 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+5%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
139 EFps 147 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+6%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
139 EFps +2% 136 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 88,767 user samples
44,448 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 100% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 79% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 79% Great: 100%
SPEED RANK: 139th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
44,319 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 94% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 94% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 78th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
93.2 % 103 % Faster effective speed.
+11%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
89.5 Pts +2% 87.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
136 Pts 171 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+26%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
268 Pts 333 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+24%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
520 Pts 638 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+23%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
903 Pts 1,114 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+23%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
95.5 Pts 95.6 Pts +0%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
144 Pts 183 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+27%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
285 Pts 360 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+26%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
569 Pts 700 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+23%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1,044 Pts 1,279 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+23%
Market Share
Based on 69,000,659 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.61 % Much higher market share.
+39%
0.44 %
Value
Value For Money
98.2 % 104 % Slightly better value.
+6%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 76 % Much more popular.
+41%
Price
Price (score)
$230 Cheaper.
+15%
$270
Age
Newest
53+ Months 43 Months More recent.
+19%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1,501 Pts 1,734 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+16%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1,330 Pts 1,600 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+20%

Good value [Jun '22 conicality1]

MORE DETAILS

The i9-11900K is the fastest CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup which brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) and 50% stronger integrated graphics. There are also 500 series chipset improvements including: 20 PCIe4 CPU lanes (up from 16) and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps up from 10 Gbps). Rocket Lake’s IPC uplift translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback