Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8070110700
IntelBX8070110900K

8 Cores, 16 Threads @2.9GHz, Comet Lake.
Release date: Q2 2020.

10 Cores, 20 Threads @3.7GHz, Comet Lake.
Release date: Q2 2020.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
284 EFps 313 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+10%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
106 EFps 109 EFps +3%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
139 EFps +1% 138 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
139 EFps 142 EFps +2%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
139 EFps +3% 135 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 178,279 user samples
71,010 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 100% Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 7.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 75% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 75% Great: 100%
SPEED RANK: 143rd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
107,269 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 89% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Poor: 89% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 91st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
92.6 % 99.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
88.4 Pts 91.1 Pts +3%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
137 Pts 149 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+9%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
268 Pts 295 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+10%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
520 Pts 579 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+11%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
899 Pts 1100 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+22%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
95.9 Pts 97.4 Pts +2%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
144 Pts 158 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+10%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
285 Pts 314 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+10%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
568 Pts 623 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+10%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1031 Pts 1222 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+19%
Market Share
Based on 68,928,838 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.52 % Higher market share.
+24%
0.42 %
Value
Value For Money
86.3 % 86.6 % +0%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
57 % 66 % More popular.
+16%
Price
Price (score)
$359 Cheaper.
+23%
$463
Age
Newest
54 Months 54 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 10 cores Higher core count.
+25%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 20 threads Higher thread count.
+25%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.9 GHz 3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+28%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.8 GHz 5.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+10%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1502 Pts 2033 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+35%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1308 Pts 1888 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+44%
Series
CPU Architecture
Comet Lake Comet Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1200 FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 630 UHD 630
Cache
Cache
16 MB Intel® Smart Cache 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
4.80 GHz 5.30 GHz
Thermal Solution Specification
Thermal Solution Specification
PCG 2015C PCG 2015D

More specs » More specs »

Intel’s Comet Lake flagship, the i9-10900K, is the fastest gaming and desktop CPU currently available. This ten-core hyperthreaded processor can easily be overclocked so that all twenty threads run at an eye-watering 5.2 GHz. Whilst its stellar performance is second to none, it comes with a premium price tag of $488 USD. The 10900K also requires a new (Z490) LGA1200 motherboard, which Intel has indicated will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. Whilst AMD’s competing $420 USD Ryzen 3900X and $675 USD Ryzen 3950X do have a greater number of cores, their lower clock speeds and higher memory latency handicap them in non-rendering use cases. Overall, the 10900K has a 16% effective speed advantage over both the 3900X and 3950X. Users that do a lot of rendering should investigate dedicated hardware encoders such as NVENC and Quick Sync as these are far more efficient than CPU based rendering. Comparing the 10900K and 10700K shows that, when paired with a 2060S, the 10700K offers comparable gaming performance for 20% less money. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback