Today's hottest deals
Intel
IntelAW8063801208001
  

2 Cores, 4 Threads @1.8 GHz, Skylake.
Release date ≈ Q4 2015.

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.6GHz, Ivy Bridge.
Release date: Q1 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 63,092 user samples
1,781 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 40% Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 40% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 689th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
61,311 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 58% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 30% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 30% Great: 58%
SPEED RANK: 861st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
55.9 % Faster effective speed.
+15%
48.7 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.1 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
70.6 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
76.9 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+19%
64.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
135 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+22%
111 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
208 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+33%
156 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
212 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+29%
164 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
88.4 Pts +4% 85.4 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
90.4 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+12%
80.6 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
162 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+17%
138 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
239 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+21%
198 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
239 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+20%
199 Pts
Market Share
Based on 69,052,116 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.05 % Hugely higher market share.
+400%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
50 % 54 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Age
Newest
109+ Months More recent.
+23%
142 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
239 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+20%
199 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
214 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+30%
164 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'15 Q1'13
Cache
Cache
4 MB SmartCache 3 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 AVX
Lithography
Lithography
14 nm 22 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$304.00 $225.00
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz 3.2 GHz
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
34.1 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® Iris™ Graphics 540 Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
300 MHz 650 MHz
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI eDP/DP/HDMI/SDVO/CRT
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
950 MHz 1.1 GHz
Package Size
Package Size
42x24x1.3 31mm x 24mm (BGA1023)
Graphics and IMC Lithography
Graphics and IMC Lithography
14 nm 22 nm
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
Yes No
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
12 1

More specs » More specs »

The Intel Core i5-3230M is a dual-core four thread mobile processor based on the 3rd generation Ivy Bridge architecture. It was launched in Q1 2013 and, for a mobile processor, scores a reasonable effective speedscore of 66: the base clock speed is 2.6 GHz which can reach 3.2 GHz under turbo boost. The i5-3230M features Intel HD Graphics 4000, so both the GPU and CPU are improvement over the comparable i5 Sandy Bridge processors. The i5-3230M is absolutely fine for casual usage, however, like most laptop processors, would struggle with CPU intensive tasks such as CAD and video encoding. Additionally the IGP is unsuitable for the graphics requirements of modern 3D games. Despite having a respectable TDP of 35W this is halved in more recent processors such as the i5-3317U which leads to more battery life. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback