Intel
IntelBX80637I33225

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.4 GHz, Haswell.
Release date ≤ Q4 2013.

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.3GHz, Ivy Bridge.
Release date: Q3 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 52,364 user samples
49,019 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 478th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
3,345 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 616th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
66.5 % Faster effective speed.
+14%
58.5 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
80.2 Pts 80.9 Pts +1%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
95 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+15%
82.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
186 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+28%
145 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
303 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+44%
211 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
322 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+50%
214 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.4 Pts 93.3 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
105 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+14%
91.8 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
207 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+20%
173 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
377 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+62%
232 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
380 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+64%
232 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,125,214 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.1 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
105 % Hugely better value.
+88%
56.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
51 %
Price
Price (score)
$52 Hugely cheaper.
+84%
$325
Age
Newest
126+ Months More recent.
+11%
142 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
379 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+63%
233 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
322 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+50%
215 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q2'13 Q3'12
Cache
Cache
6 MB SmartCache 3 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$213.00 - $224.00 $134.00
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
5 GT/s DMI2 5 GT/s DMI
Thermal Solution Specification
Thermal Solution Specification
PCG 2013D 2011C
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V DDR3 1333/1600
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
350 MHz 650 MHz
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1.2 GHz 1.05 GHz
Turbo Boost Tech
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡
2.0 No
Hyper-Threading Tech
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡
No Yes
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
Yes No
vPro Tech
Intel® vPro™ Technology ‡
Yes No
AES New Instructions
Intel® AES New Instructions
Yes No
Secure Key
Secure Key
Yes No
Trusted Execution Tech
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡
Yes No
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
Up to 3.0 2.0
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Core i3-3225 Ivy Bridge processor offers both superb real world performance and excellent value for money. For raw single threaded performance the i3-3225 scores 28% lower than the i7-3770K but costs less than half as much. At first glance one might assume that I am crazy for recommending a puny Core-i3 over the mighty Core-i7's but for real world consumer use there is simply no point in having 4 cores and 8 threads, they will hardly ever be used. All of the third gen Ivy Bridge Core-i3s are superb but the i3-3225 sports the slightly more 3D capable HD 4000 Graphics vs the HD 2500 offered on the other models. For real-world performance in an energy efficient package with modest on-board graphics, this is a superb choice. For most use cases including: email, surfing, watching movies, listening to music and office apps, this processor will deliver almost as good an experience as any other processor on the market. [Jun '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback