Today's hottest deals
Intel
IntelBX80646I34160

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3 GHz, Haswell.
Release date ≈ Q3 2014.

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.6GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 60,104 user samples
11,598 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 49% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 49% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 478th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
48,506 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 34% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 34% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 705th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
67.1 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
55.1 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79.1 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
73 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
91.1 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+5%
86.4 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
178 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+17%
152 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
319 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+48%
215 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
328 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+46%
224 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.2 Pts 92 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
104 Pts +3% 101 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
197 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+10%
179 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
374 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+41%
265 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
374 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+42%
264 Pts
Market Share
Based on 69,001,239 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.13 % Hugely higher market share.
+117%
0.06 %
Value
Value For Money
94.9 % Much better value.
+37%
69.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % 54 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$79 Much cheaper.
+34%
$120
Age
Newest
122+ Months 122 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
374 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+41%
266 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
329 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+47%
224 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q2'14 Q3'14
Cache
Cache
6 MB SmartCache 3 MB SmartCache
Embedded Options Available
Embedded Options Available
Yes No
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$192.00 - $202.00 $117.00
ECC Memory Supported
ECC Memory Supported ‡
No Yes
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Intel® HD Graphics 4400
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/VGA eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI/VGA
Turbo Boost Tech
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡
2.0 No
Hyper-Threading Tech
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡
No Yes
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
Yes No
vPro Tech
Intel® vPro™ Technology ‡
Yes No
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Yes No
Trusted Execution Tech
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡
Yes No

More specs » More specs »

I love it! My little Dell optiplex 9020 with him have consumption 20W :) [Dec '20 djtonda]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i3-4160 is a dual-core four threaded 4th generation (Haswell) processor. It was released in Q3 2014 and scores a respectable 91 for effective speed. With its base frequency of 3.6 GHz, the 4160 is fast enough to run the vast majority of applications smoothly and it’s very reasonably priced for its performance which make it a sensible choice even when considering building a gaming PC. Although the integrated Intel HD Graphics 4400 are absolutely fine for general desktop use such as web browsing and word processing they may bottleneck a gaming machine. A 20% price premium would buy the slightly older i3-4350 which has a 33% larger (4MB) cache but its only about 1% faster (full comparison here). Overall the i3-4160 represents the best value for money I have seen outside Intel's Pentium and Celeron range of CPUs. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback