Intel
IntelBX80646I74771

4 Cores, 4 Threads @2.5 GHz, Sandy Bridge.
Release date ≤ Q4 2013.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q2 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 22,167 user samples
10,987 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 46% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 46% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 585th / 1451
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
11,180 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 60% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 60% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 336th / 1451
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
60.4 % 73.5 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81.1 Pts 84.2 Pts +4%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
70.6 Pts 101 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+43%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
133 Pts 193 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+45%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
230 Pts 340 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+48%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
236 Pts 512 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+117%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.4 Pts 93.9 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
84.5 Pts 111 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+31%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
157 Pts 220 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+40%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
272 Pts 406 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+49%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
271 Pts 571 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+111%
Market Share
Based on 68,072,170 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.02 % Hugely higher market share.
+100%
Value
Value For Money
88.2 % 90.8 % +3%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 54 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score)
$70 Much cheaper.
+46%
$129
Age
Newest
126+ Months +5% 132 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
271 Pts 573 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+111%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
238 Pts 519 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+118%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q1'11 Q3'13
Cache
Cache
6 MB SmartCache 8 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Lithography
Lithography
32 nm 22 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
N/A $314.00 - $320.00
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz 3.9 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
5 GT/s DMI 5 GT/s DMI2
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3 1066/1333 DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
21 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 2000 Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
850 MHz 350 MHz
Wireless Display
Intel® Wireless Display
No Yes
# of Displays Supported
# of Displays Supported ‡
2 3
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1.1 GHz 1.2 GHz
Hyper-Threading Tech
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡
No Yes
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
2.0 Up to 3.0

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

I use it on iMac 2011 and it’s ok, fast for most tasks. [Mar '20 Thibs]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel i7-4771 is the same as the i7-4770 apart from a 100 MHz increase in base clock from 3.4 GHz to 3.5 GHz. In theory this increase will only impact multi-core workloads because both processors have the same turbo clock of 3.9 GHz which should be engaged during single and dual core workloads. On multi-core workloads the turbo needs to be disabled in order to maintain acceptable core temperatures and operating frequencies drop to base clock where the i7-4771 has a marginal 100 MHz or 2.9% advantage. In other words the two processors should be largely identical. Looking at the i7-4770 vs the i7-4771 benchmarks verifies this. Both the 4770 and 4771 are the current top end mainstream market leaders but for the vast majority of desktop users they are probably overkill as typical consumer use rarely requires more than two cores. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback