Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8071514400
IntelBX8070811900K

10 Cores, 16 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2023.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.5GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 44,349 user samples
30 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 111% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 101% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
44,319 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 94% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 94% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 73rd / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
107 % +3% 103 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79.8 Pts 87.4 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+10%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
191 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+12%
171 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
380 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+14%
333 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
714 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+12%
638 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1194 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+7%
1114 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
88.9 Pts 95.6 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
196 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+7%
183 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
394 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+9%
360 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
773 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+10%
700 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1252 Pts 1279 Pts +2%
Market Share
Based on 68,630,687 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % 0.51 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,600%
Value
Value For Money
114 % Slightly better value.
+8%
105 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
50 % 75 % Much more popular.
+50%
Price
Price (score)
$220 Cheaper.
+15%
$260
Age
Newest
9+ Months Much more recent.
+78%
41 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1704 Pts 1734 Pts +2%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1667 Pts +4% 1600 Pts

The i9-11900K is the fastest CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup which brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) and 50% stronger integrated graphics. There are also 500 series chipset improvements including: 20 PCIe4 CPU lanes (up from 16) and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps up from 10 Gbps). Rocket Lake’s IPC uplift translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback