IntelBX8071512500
Intel
$225

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.0GHz, Alder Lake.
Release date: Q1 2022.

 $225 

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.5GHz, Sandy Bridge.
Release date: Q1 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 55,551 user samples
3,715 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 91% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Poor: 91% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 83rd / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
51,836 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 25% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 25% Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 842nd / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
99.2 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+103%
48.9 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
80.8 Pts Lower memory latency.
+11%
72.9 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
181 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+194%
61.5 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
343 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+230%
104 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
631 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+332%
146 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
992 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+561%
150 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91 Pts +2% 89.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
191 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+139%
79.8 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
368 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+165%
139 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
689 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+259%
192 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1053 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+448%
192 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,164,043 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.06 % Hugely higher market share.
+500%
0.01 %
Value
Value For Money
109 % Hugely better value.
+111%
51.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
57 % +4% 55 %
Price
Price (score)
$196 Cheaper.
+13%
$225
Age
Newest
30 Months Much more recent.
+80%
150 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts 35 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+46%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200%
2 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200%
4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+69%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3 GHz Faster base frequency.
+20%
2.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+48%
3.1 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1251 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+552%
192 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1199 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+699%
150 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Alder Lake Sandy Bridge
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1700 FCBGA1023
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 770 HD 3000
ADVERTISEMENT

Intel's i5 12500 is a weird processor. It is around $40 more expensive than the i5 12400(F) for slightly higher clocks and a better iGPU that most gamers will not care about - which is the thing Alder Lake focuses most on from what we've seen. It is not good value. This does not mean it is a bad CPU, it is still very capable of gaming and could be more capable in workstation and desktop use thanks to the improved iGPU. I do not believe it deserves a $40 tax for those situations though. [Apr '22 Waaaaaal]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i5-2450M is a mid-range dual-core four threaded mobile processor based on the Sandy Bridge architecture. It was launched in Q1 2012 and is a slightly quicker version of the i5-2410M which launched a year earlier. At the time of release, the 2450M was reasonably fast with an effective speed of 61: the base clock speed is 2.5 GHz which can boost up to 3.1 GHz. The TDP of 35W is relatively high by modern standards and is halved in the i5-3317U (see full comparison). A lower TDP leads to extended battery life which is obviously a big plus for mobile processors. The i5-2450M features integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 which isn't adequate for most modern games but it's absolutely fine for handling typical tasks such as browsing and word processing. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback