Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8071512400F
1st

6 Cores, 12 Threads @2.5GHz, Alder Lake.
Release date: Q1 2022.

  

4 Cores, 4 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q2 2023.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 54,057 user samples
54,052 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 106% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 87% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 103rd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
5 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 30% Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 30% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 895th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
98.1 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+107%
47.3 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
80.6 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+75%
46 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
173 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+143%
71.1 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
330 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+120%
150 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
620 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+121%
280 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
989 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+251%
282 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
90.9 Pts Much lower OC memory latency.
+33%
68.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
183 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+83%
100 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
353 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+69%
209 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
672 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+89%
356 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1,070 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+197%
360 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,998,103 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.83 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
96 % Hugely more popular.
+92%
50 %
Age
Newest
34 Months 19+ Months Much more recent.
+44%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1,232 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+251%
351 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1,191 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+315%
287 Pts

Intel’s Alder Lake i5-12400F offers six hyper-threaded performance cores at an MSRP of just $180 USD. This represents excellent value for consumers and, in particular, gamers. It has a boost frequency of 4.4 GHz, 18 MB of L3 cache and a TDP of 65W. The F-version of the CPU does not have integrated graphics, however this will be of little concern to gamers with discrete GPUs. Whilst Intel’s overclockable i5-12600K has four additional efficiency cores and offers around 12% more performance than the 12400F, it also costs around 50% more. The 12400F offers great value, but to achieve optimal performance the requisite B660 motherboard (which supports 3200+ RAM) is, at least for now, difficult to find at reasonable ($150 USD) prices. AMD’s top value hex-core Ryzen 5 5600X offers similar performance for 50% more money. Despite Intel’s price / performance lead, AMD’s prolific marketers (forums, youtube, reddit etc.) have historically outsold Intel whilst carrying a similar handicap. [Jan '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback