UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 3 3300X vs Intel Core i5-11600K

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IntelBX8070811600K

BUY • $180

AMD100-100000159BOX

BUY • $150

BenchYourCPU

Watch Gameplay


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	296 EFps	Better CSGO EFps. +18%	251 EFps
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	108 EFps	Slightly Better GTAV EFps. +9%	99 EFps
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	142 EFps	Slightly Better Overwatch EFps. +8%	131 EFps
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	143 EFps	Better PUBG EFps. +27%	113 EFps
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	134 EFps	+5%	128 EFps

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 59,259 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

43,966 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 91% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)

Poor: 91% Great: 108%

SPEED RANK: 76^th / 1442

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

15,293 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 89% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 69% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)

Poor: 69% Great: 89%

SPEED RANK: 242^nd / 1442

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 68%

Battle cruiser


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		99.3 %	Faster effective speed. +25%		79.7 %


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	88.4 Pts	Lower memory latency. +14%	77.3 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	162 Pts	Faster single-core speed. +18%	137 Pts
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	313 Pts	Faster dual-core speed. +22%	257 Pts
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	592 Pts	Much faster quad-core speed. +34%	443 Pts
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	945 Pts	Much faster octa-core speed. +43%	662 Pts


Memory OC Memory Latency	95.4 Pts	Slightly lower OC memory latency. +9%	87.6 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	172 Pts	Faster OC single-core speed. +17%	147 Pts
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	338 Pts	Faster OC dual-core speed. +17%	289 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	661 Pts	Much faster OC quad-core speed. +32%	500 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	1034 Pts	Much faster OC octa-core speed. +38%	748 Pts

Market Share

Based on 67,758,389 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.3 %	Insanely higher market share. +1,400%	0.02 %
Value Value For Money	112 %	Better value. +19%	94.4 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	90 %	More popular. +29%	70 %
Price Price (score)	$180		$150	Cheaper. +17%


Age Newest	36 Months	More recent. +23%	47 Months
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	125 Watts		65 Watts	Much more energy efficient. +48%
Cores CPU Processing Cores	6 cores	Much higher core count. +50%	4 cores
Threads CPU Processing Threads	12 threads	Much higher thread count. +50%	8 threads
Lithography Manufacturing process	14 nm		7 nm	Much newer manufacturing. +50%
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.9 GHz	+3%	3.8 GHz
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	4.9 GHz	Faster turbo frequency. +14%	4.3 GHz
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	1256 Pts	Much faster OC 64-core speed. +67%	753 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	1165 Pts	Much faster 64-core speed. +72%	677 Pts


Series CPU Architecture	Rocket Lake	Zen2
Socket Motherboard Socket	FCLGA1200	AM4
Graphics Integrated Graphics	UHD 750	None

The i5-11600K is the best value "top tier" CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup. With a simple overclock it offers almost the same levels of performance as the 11900K. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. ^{[Mar '21 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The 3300X is a 4-core Ryzen CPU. Priced at just $120 USD, it offers far better value to gamers than all the previous Ryzen CPUs. This is great news for potential buyers, but bad luck for gamers that recently spent nearly three times more on the 8-core 3700X. The reduction from eight to four cores results in more efficient caching and higher boost clocks. AMD’s marketing has abruptly broken from the firmly established “moar cores” mantra to a conveniently realistic: four cores are actually okay. Shifting goalposts this quickly reveals an unhealthy focus on first time buyers and a brazen disregard for existing customers. Sales tactics aside, unfortunately the 3300X remains constrained by architectural latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). Comparing an overclocked 3300X pegged at 4425 MHz to a stock Intel Core i3-10100 running at 4100 MHz shows that the i3-10100 delivers better gaming performance in four out of five games. The 10100 also includes an iGPU with QuickSync hardware encoding. Since additional cores make little difference to gamers, there are no significant upgrades beyond the 3300X in the Ryzen product stack. In order to achieve better gaming performance, it is necessary to upgrade to a higher tier Intel CPU. Despite the barrage of anonymous hearsay pushed on social media, users will be hard pressed to find actual use cases that favor the 3300X over the i3-10100, especially when the 10100 is not handicapped by 2666 MHz RAM. Gamers are bottlenecked by the Ryzen architecture and desktop users need integrated graphics. ^{[Jun '20 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback