Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8070811400F
IntelCL8068404069006

6 Cores, 12 Threads @2.6GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

  

8 Cores, 16 Threads @2.30 GHz, 45 W.
Release date ≈ Q1 2019.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 57,704 user samples
46,609 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 88% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 88% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 134th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
11,095 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 90% Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 56% Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 56% Great: 90%
SPEED RANK: 271st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
94.2 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
78.9 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
87.2 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
81.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
147 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+29%
114 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
285 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+30%
219 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
544 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+32%
411 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
855 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+23%
697 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
95 Pts +3% 92.3 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
153 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+12%
136 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
303 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+14%
265 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
588 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+16%
507 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
913 Pts 936 Pts +3%
Market Share
Based on 69,025,680 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.83 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,667%
0.03 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
90 % Much more popular.
+70%
53 %
Age
Newest
43 Months Much more recent.
+36%
67+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1,120 Pts 1,209 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+8%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1,049 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+14%
924 Pts

The Rocket Lake i5-11400F paired with a B560 motherboard and 3200 RAM ($365 USD) offers unprecedented value for money to gamers. It completely prices AMD's 5000 series out of the market. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The low 2.3GHz base clock makes this CPU actually somewhat nice to use in the 2019 MacBook Pro 16”.  [May '23 Honque]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback