Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8070811400F
AMD100-100001404WOF

6 Cores, 12 Threads @2.6GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen5.
Release date: Q3 2024.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 46,647 user samples
46,609 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 88% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 88% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 134th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
38 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 129% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 102% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 102% Great: 129%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
94.2 % 116 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
87.2 Pts Lower memory latency.
+10%
79.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
147 Pts 226 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+54%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
285 Pts 440 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+54%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
544 Pts 818 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+50%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
855 Pts 1,466 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+71%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
95 Pts +3% 92.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
153 Pts 244 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+59%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
303 Pts 487 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+61%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
588 Pts 961 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+63%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
913 Pts 1,846 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+102%
Market Share
Based on 69,052,293 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.86 % Hugely higher market share.
+975%
0.08 %
Value
Value For Money
123 % Slightly better value.
+10%
112 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
90 % Much more popular.
+61%
56 %
Price
Price (score)
$106 Much cheaper.
+67%
$318
Age
Newest
43 Months 3 Months Hugely more recent.
+93%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts 65 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 4 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+71%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.6 GHz 3.8 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+46%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz 5.5 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+25%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1,120 Pts 2,403 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+115%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1,049 Pts 2,098 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+100%
Series
CPU Architecture
Rocket Lake Zen5
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1200 AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None RDNA2

The Rocket Lake i5-11400F paired with a B560 motherboard and 3200 RAM ($365 USD) offers unprecedented value for money to gamers. It completely prices AMD's 5000 series out of the market. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9000 CPUs have the same integrated graphics, PCIe lanes, USB support and DRAM controller as the Ryzen 7000 series. The only difference is improved cores which have moved from TSMC's 5 nm process to 4 nm. The new cores offer 15% more performance under cherry-picked conditions but for latency-sensitive workloads, like gaming, they are just few percent faster. The 9600X, 9700X, 9900X, and 9950X are priced at $280, $360, $500, and $650, respectively, making them $80-$200 USD more expensive than the 7000 series. Since the 7000 series flopped (7800X3D somewhat excluded) due to unrealistic pricing, slow boot times, high platform costs and windows gamebar requirements etc., the 9000 series is more or less DOA. When the 9000X3D variants launch (expected in early 2025) gamers who play cache sensitive games such as SoTTR or Factorio with a 4090 and don’t mind frame drops, may find value in the 9800X3D. Meanwhile, Intel’s 12th and 13th gen CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. Furthermore, Intel is scheduled to launch Arrow-Lake (est. +10% performance vs 14th gen) and Lunar-Lake (snapdragon competitive x86 battery life) this year, but they face serious challenges due to reliance on marketers who are mostly funded by AMD. Even if Arrow and Lunar Lake deliver stellar performance, without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Aug '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback