Today's hottest deals
IntelBX80684I38350K
SnapdragonX1E80100

4 Cores, 4 Threads @4.0GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q3 2017.

  

12 Cores, 12 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q2 2024.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 23,550 user samples
23,493 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 93% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 93%
SPEED RANK: 228th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
57 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 69% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 64% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 64% Great: 69%
SPEED RANK: 489th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
81.7 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
66.3 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
89 Pts Lower memory latency.
+30%
68.5 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
123 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+36%
90.4 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
245 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+39%
176 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
428 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+24%
344 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
442 Pts 679 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+54%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
96.6 Pts Much lower OC memory latency.
+34%
71.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
146 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+45%
101 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
290 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+44%
202 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
544 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+52%
359 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
557 Pts 705 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+27%
Market Share
Based on 68,612,039 CPUs tested
User Rating
UBM User Rating
55 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
50 %
Age
Newest
84 Months 2+ Months Hugely more recent.
+98%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
545 Pts 1050 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+93%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
445 Pts 958 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+115%

The quad core i3-8350K hails from Intel’s most recent (and as yet unreleased) generation of Coffee Lake processors. It has a stock clock of 4.0 GHz, 8MB of cache and a TDP of 95W. The 8350K is the first i3 processor to feature four cores (previous generations of i3s had two cores and four threads). With this eighth generation of processors, Intel has introduced a step change in their nomenclature which witnesses the old quad core i5s become the new quad core i3s. Our benchmarks show a 25% increase in effective speed between generations of i3 8350K vs 7350K and near equivalence between the outgoing i5-7600K and the new i3-8350K. Although the price points of Coffee Lake are not yet known, if Intel keep them roughly in line with the previous generations (i3 ~= $140) this will represent the best improvement in value for money since Sandy Bridge as the 8350K at $140 would be 34.8% cheaper than a 7600K at $215. Cynics among us will see this as an effort to fend off competition from AMD’s new multi-core Ryzen processors. It appears Intel may have been successful with this move as early benchmarks from the 8350K suggest that it beats the more expensive 8 core Ryzen 7 1700 in single and quad core performance by 25%. The 8350K is a great choice for gaming builds, but the budget will also need to factor in a complementary motherboard based on the new 300 series chipset. Expect the quad core i3-8100 which is the 8350K’s little sister featuring a base clock of 3.6 GHz, to follow shortly. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

These are early user benchmarks for the new Snapdragon ARM-based CPUs for Windows. These tests were run in x86 compatibility mode so it’s fair to assume at least a 20% performance penalty vs. native ARM applications. The results provide an approximate indication of performance for x86 applications running on the new ARM Oryon platform. Compared to the 28-watt Meteor Lake Core Ultra 5 125H, the ARM platform shows improved latency but lags in both single and multi-core performance. [Jun '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback