UserBenchmark: Intel Core i3-8350K vs i5-11400F

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IntelBX80684I38350K

BUY • $100

IntelBX8070811400F

BUY • $116

BenchYourCPU

Watch Comparable Gameplay: 9350KF vs 11400F


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	270 EFps	+4%	259 EFps
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	108 EFps	+2%	106 EFps
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	134 EFps		142 EFps	Slightly Better Overwatch EFps. +6%
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	125 EFps		134 EFps	Slightly Better PUBG EFps. +7%
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	145 EFps	Better Fortnite EFps. +11%	131 EFps

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 70,102 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

23,493 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 93% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)

Poor: 68% Great: 93%

SPEED RANK: 214^th / 1441

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

46,609 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 101% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 88% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)

Poor: 88% Great: 101%

SPEED RANK: 115^th / 1441

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		81.7 %			94.2 %	Faster effective speed. +15%


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	89 Pts	+2%	87.2 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	123 Pts		147 Pts	Faster single-core speed. +20%
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	245 Pts		285 Pts	Faster dual-core speed. +16%
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	428 Pts		544 Pts	Faster quad-core speed. +27%
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	442 Pts		855 Pts	Hugely faster octa-core speed. +93%


Memory OC Memory Latency	96.6 Pts	+2%	95 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	146 Pts		153 Pts	+5%
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	290 Pts		303 Pts	+4%
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	544 Pts		588 Pts	Slightly faster OC quad-core speed. +8%
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	557 Pts		913 Pts	Much faster OC octa-core speed. +64%

Market Share

Based on 67,706,356 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.04 %		0.82 %	Insanely higher market share. +1,950%
Value Value For Money	108 %		120 %	Better value. +11%
User Rating UBM User Rating	55 %		90 %	Much more popular. +64%
Price Price (score)	$100	Cheaper. +14%	$116


Age Newest	79 Months		36 Months	Much more recent. +54%
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	91 Watts		65 Watts	More energy efficient. +29%
Cores CPU Processing Cores	4 cores		6 cores	Much higher core count. +50%
Threads CPU Processing Threads	4 threads		12 threads	Hugely higher thread count. +200%
Lithography Manufacturing process	14 nm		14 nm
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	4 GHz	Much faster base frequency. +54%	2.6 GHz
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	4 GHz		4.4 GHz	Faster turbo frequency. +10%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	545 Pts		1120 Pts	Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +106%
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	445 Pts		1049 Pts	Hugely faster 64-core speed. +136%


Series CPU Architecture	Coffee Lake	Rocket Lake
Socket Motherboard Socket	FCLGA1151	FCLGA1200
Graphics Integrated Graphics	UHD 630	None

The quad core i3-8350K hails from Intel’s most recent (and as yet unreleased) generation of Coffee Lake processors. It has a stock clock of 4.0 GHz, 8MB of cache and a TDP of 95W. The 8350K is the first i3 processor to feature four cores (previous generations of i3s had two cores and four threads). With this eighth generation of processors, Intel has introduced a step change in their nomenclature which witnesses the old quad core i5s become the new quad core i3s. Our benchmarks show a 25% increase in effective speed between generations of i3 8350K vs 7350K and near equivalence between the outgoing i5-7600K and the new i3-8350K. Although the price points of Coffee Lake are not yet known, if Intel keep them roughly in line with the previous generations (i3 ~= $140) this will represent the best improvement in value for money since Sandy Bridge as the 8350K at $140 would be 34.8% cheaper than a 7600K at $215. Cynics among us will see this as an effort to fend off competition from AMD’s new multi-core Ryzen processors. It appears Intel may have been successful with this move as early benchmarks from the 8350K suggest that it beats the more expensive 8 core Ryzen 7 1700 in single and quad core performance by 25%. The 8350K is a great choice for gaming builds, but the budget will also need to factor in a complementary motherboard based on the new 300 series chipset. Expect the quad core i3-8100 which is the 8350K’s little sister featuring a base clock of 3.6 GHz, to follow shortly. ^{[Aug '17 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The Rocket Lake i5-11400F paired with a B560 motherboard and 3200 RAM ($365 USD) offers unprecedented value for money to gamers. It completely prices AMD's 5000 series out of the market. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. ^{[Mar '21 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback