IntelBX80646I34160
Intel

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.6GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q3 2014.

  

4 Cores, 4 Threads @1.50 GHz, Apollo Lake.
Release date ≈ Q1 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 49,601 user samples
48,506 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 34% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 34% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 689th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
1,095 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 40% Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 21% Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 21% Great: 40%
SPEED RANK: 1268th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
55.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+67%
32.9 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
73 Pts Hugely lower memory latency.
+89%
38.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
86.4 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+92%
45 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
152 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+75%
87.1 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
215 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+37%
157 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
224 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+39%
161 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92 Pts Hugely lower OC memory latency.
+89%
48.6 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
101 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+95%
51.7 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
179 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+79%
99.8 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
265 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+37%
193 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
264 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+37%
193 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,982,133 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.08 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
51 %
Age
Newest
117 Months 88+ Months More recent.
+25%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
266 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+38%
193 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
224 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+42%
158 Pts
Cache
Cache
3 MB SmartCache 2 MB
Lithography
Lithography
22 nm 14 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$117.00 $161.00
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
32 GB 8 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
ECC Memory Supported
ECC Memory Supported ‡
Yes No
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 4400 Intel® HD Graphics 505
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
350 MHz 250.00 MHz
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI/VGA eDP/DP/HDMI/MIPI-DSI
Wireless Display
Intel® Wireless Display
Yes No
InTru 3D Tech
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Yes No
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Video Max Memory
2 GB 8 GB
Package Size
Package Size
37.5mm x 37.5mm 24mm x 31mm
Hyper-Threading Tech
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡
Yes No
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
No Yes
Small Business Advantage
Intel® Small Business Advantage
Yes No
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
Up to 3.0 2.0
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
16 6

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i3-4160 is a dual-core four threaded 4th generation (Haswell) processor. It was released in Q3 2014 and scores a respectable 91 for effective speed. With its base frequency of 3.6 GHz, the 4160 is fast enough to run the vast majority of applications smoothly and it’s very reasonably priced for its performance which make it a sensible choice even when considering building a gaming PC. Although the integrated Intel HD Graphics 4400 are absolutely fine for general desktop use such as web browsing and word processing they may bottleneck a gaming machine. A 20% price premium would buy the slightly older i3-4350 which has a 33% larger (4MB) cache but its only about 1% faster (full comparison here). Overall the i3-4160 represents the best value for money I have seen outside Intel's Pentium and Celeron range of CPUs. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback