COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80646I34150
AMDFD8350FRHKBOX
▲ 533,203 ▼

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q2 2014.

VS
▲ 5726,764 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.0GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Effective Speed 
+10%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 349,823 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
36,627 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 34% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 674th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
313,196 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 568th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		55.2 % 60.8 % Faster effective speed.
+10%
Average Score 
+2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		73.3 Pts 81 Pts Lower memory latency.
+11%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		85.3 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+33% 		64.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		150 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+23% 		122 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		216 Pts 221 Pts +2%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		223 Pts 341 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+53%
Overclocked Score 
+4%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		92 Pts +0% 91.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		99.5 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+36% 		73.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		180 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+26% 		143 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		267 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+5% 		254 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		267 Pts 397 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+49%
Value & Sentiment 
+26%
Market Share
Based on 67,793,770 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.06 % Higher market share.
+20% 		0.05 %
Value
Value For Money 		93.1 % Better value.
+24% 		74.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		53 % 57 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score) 		$42 Much cheaper.
+68% 		$130
Nice To Haves 
+49%
Age
Newest 		120 Months More recent.
+14% 		139 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		54 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+57% 		125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		2 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+300%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		4 threads 8 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+31% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz 4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+14%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz 4.2 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+20%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		267 Pts 411 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+54%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		226 Pts 353 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+56%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Haswell Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1150 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 4400 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 55.2%
Average Bench 60.8%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i3-4150 is successor to the i3-4130 2013 Haswell processor. Looking at the 4150 and 4130 side-by-side shows that the only difference between the two processors is a 100 MHz base clock increase from 3.4 GHz on the older 4130 to 3.5 GHz on the newer 4150. The marginal 2.9% clock speed increase brings an equally marginal performance boost. Despite the academic performance gain over it's predecessor, thanks to its excellent single-core performance, the i3-4150 is still an extremely capable desktop CPU and will handle the vast majority of regular desktop computing without breaking a sweat. Coupling the i3-4150 with a discrete GPU will satisfy all but the toughest of gaming requirements. Only the lower powered but significantly cheaper Pentium G's offer better value for money. [Jun '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
36,627
313,196
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback