IntelBX8071512100F
AMD100-100000031BOX
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,076,702 user samples
4,063 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 79th / 1385
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
1,072,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 73% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 73% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 155th / 1385
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
94.1 % Faster effective speed.
+13%
83.1 %
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench...
17 % FarC6 21%, FinFant14 29%, GTAV 26%, SotTR 18%, CSGO 12%, R6S 12% TWarW3 0%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
85.3 Pts Lower memory latency.
+12%
76.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
171 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+29%
133 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
318 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+23%
259 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
556 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+15%
483 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
793 Pts +0% 792 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.6 Pts +5% 87.5 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
177 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+26%
141 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
345 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+23%
281 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
621 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+14%
546 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
829 Pts 869 Pts +5%
Market Share
Based on 58,840,585 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.41 % 1.12 % Hugely higher market share.
+173%
Value
Value For Money
125 % Better value.
+17%
107 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % +4% 94 %
Price
Price (score)
$98 Cheaper.
+11%
$110
Age
Newest
12 Months Much more recent.
+71%
42 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
58 Watts More energy efficient.
+11%
65 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 6 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
8 threads 12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
10 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+30%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.3 GHz 3.6 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz +2% 4.2 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
835 Pts 1091 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+31%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
800 Pts 999 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+25%
Series
CPU Architecture
Alder Lake Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1700 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

Gaming is more accessible with the i3-12100F: Intel’s entry level Alder Lake desktop processor. Higher end Alder Lake processors feature a combination of performance and efficiency cores, however, the 12100F contains just four hyper-threaded Golden Cove performance cores. It has a max boost frequency of 4.3 GHz, 12 MB of L3 cache and a 58W TDP. The 12100F is keenly priced at around $130 USD and needs to be paired with a new chipset such as the B660. Only users with discrete GPUs should consider “F” models as they do not have integrated graphics. Whilst a budget PC built around the 12100F represents unbeatable value for money, the 6-core i5-12400F, with 50% stronger multi-core, is a better option for gamers with 3060+ tier GPUs. AMD do not have any CPUs competing in this price segment. Entry level gamers, who cannot find reasonably priced discrete GPUs, could consider the similarly performing Ryzen 5 5600G APU which has integrated RX Vega graphics that are around three times faster than Intel's UHD 730. [Jan '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-threaded processor which succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 improving upon it by 13% in terms of overclocked performance. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. AMD continues to push the multi-core performance envelope: benchmarks show that the 3600 has a 27% overclocked 64-core lead over the 9600K but that the i5-9600K leads by 14% on single to hex core workloads which translates to 10% higher EFps in most of the today’s top games (e.g. PUBG, GTAV and CSGO). Additionally, the 3600's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which adversely impacts gaming. Weaknesses in memory architecture are not readily picked up by CPU benchmarks but they are apparent whilst gaming. Cheaper CPUs such as the 9400F deliver better gaming performance in nearly all of today’s popular games. At $190 USD, the 3600 offers good value for purely workstation tasks such as film production but streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The masterfully hyped Ryzen 3600 may well be the best CPU for multimedia producers on a tight budget but in today's market there are faster and less expensive alternatives for gamers, streamers and general desktop users. [Jun '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2023 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $302Nvidia RTX 3060 $325Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $163Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $433Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback