Intel
AMD100-100000061WOF
  

2 Cores, 4 Threads @1.66 GHz, Pineview.
Release date ≤ Q1 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 61,427 user samples
1,295 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 26% Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 11% Base clock 1.65 GHz
Poor: 11% Great: 26%
SPEED RANK: 1414th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
60,132 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 79th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
21.5 % 99 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+361%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
39.8 Pts 81.1 Pts Hugely lower memory latency.
+104%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
6.53 Pts 163 Pts Insanely faster single-core speed.
+2,396%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
12.4 Pts 320 Pts Insanely faster dual-core speed.
+2,481%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
20.3 Pts 626 Pts Insanely faster quad-core speed.
+2,984%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
21 Pts 1157 Pts Insanely faster octa-core speed.
+5,410%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
50.9 Pts 92.3 Pts Hugely lower OC memory latency.
+81%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
7.3 Pts 179 Pts Insanely faster OC single-core speed.
+2,352%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
14.6 Pts 356 Pts Insanely faster OC dual-core speed.
+2,338%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
23.8 Pts 694 Pts Insanely faster OC quad-core speed.
+2,816%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
23.9 Pts 1318 Pts Insanely faster OC octa-core speed.
+5,415%
Market Share
Based on 67,767,927 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.57 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
50 % 72 % Much more popular.
+44%
Age
Newest
123+ Months 41 Months Much more recent.
+67%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
24 Pts 2290 Pts Insanely faster OC 64-core speed.
+9,442%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
21.4 Pts 2000 Pts Insanely faster 64-core speed.
+9,246%
ADVERTISEMENT

Small, low power chip with four threads designed for everyday computing like word processing and web browsing. Limited in design by its slow front side bus speed of 667MHz single-channel RAM with a max capacity of 2GB, it will work best with lightweight systems like Ubuntu / Linux and Windows 7. Despite its age and low power design those two hyperthreaded cores are more than capable of seamless tasking, just don't try too much at once. Youtube in 480p is just fine, and given the tiny 10" screen most of these CPU's are bundled in you won't need much more than that anyway. Gaming? Not much is going to happen here, given the integrated GMA 3150 chip. Updates for these things stopped long ago so unless you want to get funky with some hacked drivers you won't get much action there. Still, older titles from the late 90's should be playable with low resolutions and settings. Think Halflife, Max Payne, Age of Empires, Starcraft and Diablo 2 and you'll have realistic expectations. Overall, a good (if limited) budget CPU for basic everyday use. [May '20 boingk]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9 5900X is second in AMD’s line-up of new Zen 3 CPUs. The 12-core hyper-threaded processor has base/boost clock speeds of 3.7/4.8 GHz, a 70 MB cache and a TDP of 105W. The 5900X took center stage in the 5000 series launch presentation where AMD gunned for Intel’s “best gaming CPU” crown. They showed the 5900X as being 26% better for gaming than the previous generation’s Ryzen 9 3900XT, attributing this to the new architecture’s faster single core speeds and lower latency. AMD also stated that the 5900X achieves, on average, 6.8% faster gaming performance than Intel’s 10-core i9-10900K. The details around AMD’s testing were not disclosed but it is safe to assume that 6.8% is the highest average lead that AMD are willing to stand by. Our benchmarks show that the 5900X’s slightly faster cores and the 10900K’s slightly lower memory latency balance out to yield similar performance. Whilst presenting their figures, AMD admitted that their 3000 series CPUs were far from “best for gaming” and conceded that the 10900K is approximately 19% faster than the 3900XT (our effective speed marks the gap at just 14%). Despite this clear performance deficiency, AMD supported 3000 series sales with an aggressive and successful marketing campaign to easily outsell Intel over the last 12 months. Given the real performance uplift observed in the 5000 series, and the absence of any meaningful marketing from Intel, we expect CPU sales to shift even further in AMD’s favour. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” should investigate Intel’s $175 USD 11400F, the $660 USD savings would be far better spent on a higher tier GPU. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback