Today's hottest deals
AMD100-000000163
AMD100-100000908WOF
  

32 Cores, 64 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q1 2020.

16 Cores, 32 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q1 2023.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 3,674 user samples
1,222 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 72% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 72% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 193rd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 154%
UFO
2,452 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 125% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 113% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 113% Great: 125%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
85.8 % 120 % Much faster effective speed.
+40%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
70.4 Pts 89.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+27%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
137 Pts 209 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+53%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
274 Pts 411 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+50%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
541 Pts 802 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+48%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1075 Pts 1550 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+44%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
80.6 Pts 98.5 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+22%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
149 Pts 224 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+50%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
298 Pts 437 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+47%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
589 Pts 860 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+46%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1169 Pts 1676 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+43%
Market Share
Based on 68,929,768 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.15 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % +2% 53 %
Age
Newest
57+ Months 20+ Months Much more recent.
+65%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
6029 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+57%
3836 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
5350 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+52%
3526 Pts

Launched 7 February 2020, this multithreaded gargantuan comes with whopping 64 core and 128 thread and costs $3990 to be exact. This CPU has core clock of 2.9GHz and has max boost clock of 4.3GHz which is high for CPU with huge amount of cores and has 280W TDP which would shows how efficient this CPU is. The single core performance is not too mind boggling but the multi core performance blows all other single socket CPU in existence. Safe to say, this CPU poses incredible value for content creator, data center and regular server users alike for amount of multithreaded performance you get at that price point. [Feb '20 ColdSpy]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD 7000X3D CPUs have the same core architecture as the rest of the 7000 series but they have one group of eight "3D" cores with extra cache. The “3D” cores are priced higher but run at 10% lower clocks. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 7000X variant. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with an RTX 4090 ($2,000) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. AMD continue to develop “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers with the obvious aim of compensating for second tier products with first tier marketing. PC gamers considering a 7000X3D CPU need to work on their critical thinking skills: Influencers are paid handsomely to promote overpriced niche products (X3D, EPYC, Threadripper etc.). Rational gamers have little reason to look further than the $300 13600K which offers comparable real-world gaming and better desktop performance at a fraction of the price. Workstation users (and RTX 4080+ gamers) may find value in higher core CPUs such as the 16-core $400 13700K. Despite offering better performance at lower prices, as long as Intel continues to sample and sponsor marketers that are mostly funded by AMD, they will struggle to win market share. [Mar '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback