AMD100-100000059WOF
AMD100-100000908WOF
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 33,902 user samples
33,026 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 68th / 1445
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
876 User Benchmarks
Great Bench: 125% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor Bench: 114% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 114% Great: 125%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 1445
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
100 % 120 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81 Pts 88.5 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+9%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
164 Pts 205 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+25%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
326 Pts 408 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+25%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
639 Pts 804 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+26%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1232 Pts 1562 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+27%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.7 Pts 99.2 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
180 Pts 218 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+21%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
355 Pts 434 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+22%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
697 Pts 858 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+23%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1376 Pts 1680 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+22%
Market Share
Based on 67,911,750 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.19 % Hugely higher market share.
+171%
0.07 %
Value
Value For Money
89.7 % 99.2 % Better value.
+11%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
69 % Much more popular.
+30%
53 %
Price
Price (score)
$416 Cheaper.
+24%
$548
Age
Newest
42 Months 14+ Months Much more recent.
+67%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
3063 Pts 3863 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+26%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2633 Pts 3477 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+32%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X is an impressive workhorse. It sits at the top of AMD’s latest Zen 3 based, 5000 series of CPUs and sends a clear message that AMD can beat Intel in terms of raw performance and core count. The 5950X has a boost clock speed of up to 4.9 GHz, a massive 72 MB cache and a TDP rating of 105W. Despite the “gaming” focus of AMD’s 5000 series launch marketing, the 5950X does not efficiently leverage all its 16 cores in gaming (as demonstrated by similar effective speed scores compared to the 12-core 5900X, 8-core 5800X and 6-core 5600X.) 16 cores are only suitable for professional use cases that have CPU processing needs which cannot be more efficiently met by a GPU or other dedicated hardware. There is no Intel equivalent with this number of cores, and the 5950X’s uniqueness is reflected in its $799 USD price tag, 45% more expensive than the 5900X. Gamers will get far higher FPS per dollar by allocating a higher proportion of their budget towards a better GPU rather than blowing $799 USD on the 5950X. Professional users that plan to use 32 concurrent threads at 100% load will find value in the 5950X. On the other hand, workstation users that rarely exceed 20 concurrent threads at 100% should consider the 10850K for around half the money. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD 7000X3D CPUs have the same core architecture as the rest of the 7000 series but they have one group of eight "3D" cores with extra cache. The “3D” cores are priced higher but run at 10% lower clocks. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 7000X variant. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with an RTX 4090 ($2,000) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. AMD continue to develop “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers with the obvious aim of compensating for second tier products with first tier marketing. PC gamers considering a 7000X3D CPU need to work on their critical thinking skills: Influencers are paid handsomely to promote overpriced niche products (X3D, EPYC, Threadripper etc.). Rational gamers have little reason to look further than the $300 13600K which offers comparable real-world gaming and better desktop performance at a fraction of the price. Workstation users (and RTX 4080+ gamers) may find value in higher core CPUs such as the 16-core $400 13700K. Despite offering better performance at lower prices, as long as Intel continues to sample and sponsor marketers that are mostly funded by AMD, they will struggle to win market share. [Mar '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback