AMD100-100000059WOF
AMD100-100000071BOX
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
318 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+36%
233 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
108 EFps +3% 105 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
142 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+9%
130 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
133 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+7%
124 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
121 EFps 141 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+17%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 668,445 user samples
33,026 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 68th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
635,419 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 170th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
100 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
85.9 %
20 Oct22|HardwareLUXX
The Dino Intel is not yet extinct:...
15 % Control 19%, SpiderM 20%, RiftB 26%, TWarTroy 23%, F122 19%, DoomE 7% CPunk 12%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
14 % BFV 10%, SotTR 13%, MetroEx 20%, Divis2 13%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
16 % Forza5 6%, AoE4 14%, Bord3 21%, FarC6 6%, BFV 25%, CPunk 6%, EldenR 11%, RDR2 4%, Civ6 52%, CSGO 43%, DoomE 4% WatchDL 1%
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench...
32 % FarC6 23%, FinFant14 19%, GTAV 34%, SotTR 49%, CSGO 46%, R6S 43%, TWarW3 10%
06 Nov20|Gamers Nexus
Friendly Fire: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X C...
31 % SotTR 43%, GTAV 37%, RDR2 15%, TWarTKC 28%, F120 50%, TWarTKB 27%, ACO 18%
07 Dec20|KitGuru
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Zen 3 CPU Review
19 % GTAV 27%, SotTR 53%, RDR2 5%, F120 12%, MetroEx 9%, Divis2 6%
05 Nov20|Anandtech
AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...
15 % FarC5 29%, Bord3 9%, GTAV 15%, Civ6 36%, FinFant15 12%, Chernob 7%, DExMD 9%, FinFant14 17%, F119 18%, RDR2 0%, GearsT 22%, WoT 22% StrangeB 2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
76.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
164 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+19%
138 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
326 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+21%
270 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
639 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+25%
513 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1232 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+37%
900 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.7 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
86.6 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
180 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+24%
145 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
355 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+23%
288 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
697 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+24%
562 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1376 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+36%
1009 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,820,646 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.15 % 0.72 % Hugely higher market share.
+380%
Value
Value For Money
89.7 % 93.4 % +4%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
69 % 89 % More popular.
+29%
Price
Price (score)
$416 $205 Much cheaper.
+51%
Age
Newest
42 Months More recent.
+26%
57 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm 7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz 3.6 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.9 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+11%
4.4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
3063 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+107%
1479 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2633 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+94%
1358 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen3 Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X is an impressive workhorse. It sits at the top of AMD’s latest Zen 3 based, 5000 series of CPUs and sends a clear message that AMD can beat Intel in terms of raw performance and core count. The 5950X has a boost clock speed of up to 4.9 GHz, a massive 72 MB cache and a TDP rating of 105W. Despite the “gaming” focus of AMD’s 5000 series launch marketing, the 5950X does not efficiently leverage all its 16 cores in gaming (as demonstrated by similar effective speed scores compared to the 12-core 5900X, 8-core 5800X and 6-core 5600X.) 16 cores are only suitable for professional use cases that have CPU processing needs which cannot be more efficiently met by a GPU or other dedicated hardware. There is no Intel equivalent with this number of cores, and the 5950X’s uniqueness is reflected in its $799 USD price tag, 45% more expensive than the 5900X. Gamers will get far higher FPS per dollar by allocating a higher proportion of their budget towards a better GPU rather than blowing $799 USD on the 5950X. Professional users that plan to use 32 concurrent threads at 100% load will find value in the 5950X. On the other hand, workstation users that rarely exceed 20 concurrent threads at 100% should consider the 10850K for around half the money. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster[Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback