Today's hottest deals
AMD100-100000059WOF
AMD

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen3.
Release date: Q4 2020.

  

6 Cores, 12 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2020.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 36,372 user samples
33,026 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 85th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
3,346 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 94% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 66% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 66% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 283rd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
100 % Faster effective speed.
+29%
78 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81 Pts Lower memory latency.
+22%
66.5 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
164 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+22%
134 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
326 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+25%
260 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
639 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+33%
480 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1232 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+54%
798 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.7 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8%
86.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
180 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+24%
145 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
355 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+23%
289 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
697 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+21%
577 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1376 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+43%
964 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,957,832 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.21 % Hugely higher market share.
+320%
0.05 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
69 % Much more popular.
+33%
52 %
Age
Newest
48 Months 48+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
3063 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+161%
1174 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2633 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+162%
1006 Pts

The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X is an impressive workhorse. It sits at the top of AMD’s latest Zen 3 based, 5000 series of CPUs and sends a clear message that AMD can beat Intel in terms of raw performance and core count. The 5950X has a boost clock speed of up to 4.9 GHz, a massive 72 MB cache and a TDP rating of 105W. Despite the “gaming” focus of AMD’s 5000 series launch marketing, the 5950X does not efficiently leverage all its 16 cores in gaming (as demonstrated by similar effective speed scores compared to the 12-core 5900X, 8-core 5800X and 6-core 5600X.) 16 cores are only suitable for professional use cases that have CPU processing needs which cannot be more efficiently met by a GPU or other dedicated hardware. There is no Intel equivalent with this number of cores, and the 5950X’s uniqueness is reflected in its $799 USD price tag, 45% more expensive than the 5900X. Gamers will get far higher FPS per dollar by allocating a higher proportion of their budget towards a better GPU rather than blowing $799 USD on the 5950X. Professional users that plan to use 32 concurrent threads at 100% load will find value in the 5950X. On the other hand, workstation users that rarely exceed 20 concurrent threads at 100% should consider the 10850K for around half the money. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 4600G offers impressive performance for its price range. With its 6 cores and 12 threads, it provides solid multi-core performance, which makes it suitable for various tasks, including productivity, content creation, and even light gaming. The integrated Radeon Vega graphics on the 4600G provide decent graphical performance for an integrated solution. It's capable of handling some modern games at lower settings and resolutions. Overall, the Ryzen 5 4600G is a solid choice for users looking for a budget-friendly processor with integrated graphics capabilities. Its performance is well-suited for general computing tasks and even some light gaming, but if you're looking for higher-end gaming performance or more intense content creation tasks, you might want to consider pairing it with a dedicated graphics card or opting for a more powerful CPU from AMD's lineup. [Oct '23 FiniGamer]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback