COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000061WOF
IntelBX80623I52500K
$246
▲ 733,458 ▼

12 Cores, 24 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen3.
Release date: Q4 2020.

VS
▲ 769,583 ▼
 $246 

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.3GHz, Sandy Bridge.
Release date: Q1 2011.

Effective Speed 
+50%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 203,139 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
60,132 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 85th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
143,007 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 44% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 44% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 494th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		99 % Much faster effective speed.
+50% 		65.9 %
Average Score 
+115%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		81.1 Pts 83.1 Pts +2%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		163 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+84% 		88.4 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		320 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+84% 		174 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		626 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+123% 		281 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1157 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+286% 		300 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+85%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		92.3 Pts 94.9 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		179 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+57% 		114 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		356 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+57% 		227 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		694 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+83% 		380 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1318 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+230% 		399 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+152%
Market Share
Based on 68,095,315 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.53 % Hugely higher market share.
+562% 		0.08 %
Value
Value For Money 		102 % Much better value.
+50% 		68.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		73 % 76 % +4%
Price
Price (score) 		$249 $246 +1%
Nice To Haves 
+212%
Age
Newest 		43 Months Much more recent.
+73% 		161 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		105 Watts 95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200% 		4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+500% 		4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+78% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+12% 		3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.8 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+30% 		3.7 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		2290 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+463% 		407 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		2000 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+558% 		304 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen3 Sandy Bridge
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM4 LGA1155
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None HD 3000
Conclusion 
Average Bench 99%
Average Bench 65.9%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 9 5900X is second in AMD’s line-up of new Zen 3 CPUs. The 12-core hyper-threaded processor has base/boost clock speeds of 3.7/4.8 GHz, a 70 MB cache and a TDP of 105W. The 5900X took center stage in the 5000 series launch presentation where AMD gunned for Intel’s “best gaming CPU” crown. They showed the 5900X as being 26% better for gaming than the previous generation’s Ryzen 9 3900XT, attributing this to the new architecture’s faster single core speeds and lower latency. AMD also stated that the 5900X achieves, on average, 6.8% faster gaming performance than Intel’s 10-core i9-10900K. The details around AMD’s testing were not disclosed but it is safe to assume that 6.8% is the highest average lead that AMD are willing to stand by. Our benchmarks show that the 5900X’s slightly faster cores and the 10900K’s slightly lower memory latency balance out to yield similar performance. Whilst presenting their figures, AMD admitted that their 3000 series CPUs were far from “best for gaming” and conceded that the 10900K is approximately 19% faster than the 3900XT (our effective speed marks the gap at just 14%). Despite this clear performance deficiency, AMD supported 3000 series sales with an aggressive and successful marketing campaign to easily outsell Intel over the last 12 months. Given the real performance uplift observed in the 5000 series, and the absence of any meaningful marketing from Intel, we expect CPU sales to shift even further in AMD’s favour. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” should investigate Intel’s $175 USD 11400F, the $660 USD savings would be far better spent on a higher tier GPU. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The i5-2500K is a second generation Sandy Bridge processor which is currently two generations old and nearly three years out of date. The many users that had the good sense to purchase this processor should feel in no hurry to upgrade as it's still no slouch, even by today's standards. The benchmark figures indicate that, even at stock clock rates, in terms of real-world performance this processor is approximately 20% slower than the best currently available, not bad considering its age. Given that the 2500K has an unlocked multiplier upping its performance by 10% with stock cooling should not pose much of a problem for the majority of owners. Here is a detailed performance comparison of the 2500K vs 4670K.  [Jul '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
60,132
143,007
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback