Today's hottest deals
AMD100-100000071BOX
AMD100-100000662WOF

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

12 Cores, 24 Threads @4.4GHz, Zen5.
Release date: Q3 2024.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 635,437 user samples
635,419 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 186th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
18 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 129% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 104% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 104% Great: 129%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
85.9 % 118 % Much faster effective speed.
+37%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.2 Pts 79.6 Pts +4%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
138 Pts 223 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+62%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
270 Pts 438 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+62%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
513 Pts 831 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+62%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
900 Pts 1561 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+73%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
86.6 Pts 90.4 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
145 Pts 238 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+64%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
288 Pts 477 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+66%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
562 Pts 923 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+64%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1009 Pts 1802 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+79%
Market Share
Based on 68,632,521 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.79 % Hugely higher market share.
+778%
0.09 %
Value
Value For Money
99.2 % 103 % +4%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
89 % Much more popular.
+75%
51 %
Price
Price (score)
$165 Much cheaper.
+63%
$449
Age
Newest
62 Months 1 Months Hugely more recent.
+98%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+46%
120 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 12 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 24 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm 4 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+43%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz 4.4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+22%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz 5.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+27%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1479 Pts 3606 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+144%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1358 Pts 3021 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+122%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen5
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None RDNA2

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster[Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9000 CPUs have the same integrated graphics, PCIe lanes, USB support and DRAM controller as the Ryzen 7000 series. The only difference is improved cores which have moved from TSMC's 5 nm process to 4 nm. The new cores offer 15% more performance under cherry-picked conditions but for latency-sensitive workloads, like gaming, they are just few percent faster. The 9600X, 9700X, 9900X, and 9950X are priced at $280, $360, $500, and $650, respectively, making them $80-$200 USD more expensive than the 7000 series. Since the 7000 series flopped (7800X3D somewhat excluded) due to unrealistic pricing, slow boot times, high platform costs and windows gamebar requirements etc., the 9000 series is more or less DOA. When the 9000X3D variants launch (expected in early 2025) gamers who play cache sensitive games such as SoTTR or Factorio with a 4090 and don’t mind frame drops, may find value in the 9800X3D. Meanwhile, Intel’s 12th and 13th gen CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. Furthermore, Intel is scheduled to launch Arrow-Lake (est. +10% performance vs 14th gen) and Lunar-Lake (snapdragon competitive x86 battery life) this year, but they face serious challenges due to reliance on marketers who are mostly funded by AMD. Even if Arrow and Lunar Lake deliver stellar performance, without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Aug '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback