Today's hottest deals
AMD100-100000022BOX
AMDYD1600BBAFBOX

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

6 Cores, 12 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q3 2018.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+18%
198 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
101 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+5%
96 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
131 EFps 135 EFps +3%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
119 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+5%
113 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
131 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+14%
115 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 347,680 user samples
294,959 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 74% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 74% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 213th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
52,721 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 63% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 63% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 380th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
84.1 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
72 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.9 Pts +1% 76.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
136 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+31%
104 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
264 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+32%
200 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
490 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+34%
365 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
808 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+36%
594 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.1 Pts +4% 83.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
146 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+27%
115 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
287 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+26%
228 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
553 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+25%
443 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
878 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+29%
680 Pts
Market Share
Based on 69,050,706 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.24 % Hugely higher market share.
+243%
0.07 %
Value
Value For Money
95.5 % +4% 91.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % More popular.
+27%
55 %
Price
Price (score)
$175 $115 Much cheaper.
+34%
Age
Newest
64 Months More recent.
+15%
75+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1,106 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+27%
868 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1,017 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+33%
764 Pts

Early Q3 of 2019 sees the release of the new Ryzen 5 3600X: a hex-core, 12-thread processor. AMD are releasing five new CPUs based on their latest Zen 2 microarchitecture which delivers approximately 13% better IPC than the previous 12nm Zen+. For workstation builds the 3600X is viable, however, the $200 USD Ryzen 5 3600 represents a far better value proposition. The additional $40 USD for the 3600X basically buys a better cooler (Spire vs Stealth). This allows for an extra 200 MHz of extra base and boost clock: 3.8 / 4.4 GHz on the 3600X vs 3.6 / 4.2 GHz on the 3600, this translates to approximately 2% higher overclocked performance for 20% more money. Neither of the stock coolers on the 3600 or 3600X are as effective as a $20 USD aftermarket cooler such as the Gammaxx 400. The 3600 with a Gammaxx 400 outperforms the 3600X with a Spire cooler and when both use a Gammaxx 400 they are more or less identical. The 3600X SKU is basically a marketing gimmick designed to milk unsuspecting consumers. Comparing the 3600X to Intel’s overclocked flagship i5-9600K shows that although the 3600X has 29% faster 64-core speed, it is around 11% worse for gaming (sub eight core performance). Additionally, the 3600X's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which can also impact gaming. The arrival of Zen 2 marks the end of the "Sandy Bridge (i5-2500K)" era, Intel can no longer rely exclusively on their single-core advantage to dominate the market, they must also compete on price. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Is this the 12 nm Zen+ Ryzen 5 2600 disguised as a 1600? The "AF" model? [Jan '20 Vycyous]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback