AMDFD9370FHHKWOF
IntelBX80646I74771

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2013.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q2 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 20,234 user samples
9,054 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Base clock 5 GHz
Worst Bench: 55% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 55% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 539th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
11,180 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 60% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 60% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 328th / 1441
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
62.5 % 73.5 % Faster effective speed.
+18%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
82.3 Pts 84.2 Pts +2%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
67.7 Pts 101 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+49%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
128 Pts 193 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+51%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
232 Pts 340 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+47%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
380 Pts 512 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+35%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.1 Pts 93.9 Pts +2%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
82.2 Pts 111 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+35%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
158 Pts 220 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+39%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
290 Pts 406 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+40%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
481 Pts 571 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+19%
Market Share
Based on 67,815,672 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.02 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
69 % 90.8 % Much better value.
+32%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 54 % +2%
Price
Price (score)
$194 $129 Much cheaper.
+33%
Age
Newest
130 Months +1% 131 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 Watts 84 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+62%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
8 threads 8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+31%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+26%
3.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.7 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+21%
3.9 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
482 Pts 573 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+19%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
386 Pts 519 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+34%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver Haswell
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3+ FCLGA1150
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None HD 4600
ADVERTISEMENT

The FX-9370 is the slightly lower clocked (4.4 GHz) version of AMD's flagship FX-9 range of desktop processors. The FX-9590 comes clocked at 4.7 GHz with a staggering turbo clock of 5 GHz. Comparing the 9370 and 9590 versions shows that there is only 3% between the two processors at stock clocks but when overclocked they both have an identical performance profile. Given that the 9590 costs nearly 25% more the 9370 should be the obvious choice. Both of these processors have superb multi-core performance but they both lag Intel when it comes to single and dual-core workloads. Until AMD can improve single core performance they will continue to struggle in the high end PC market. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel i7-4771 is the same as the i7-4770 apart from a 100 MHz increase in base clock from 3.4 GHz to 3.5 GHz. In theory this increase will only impact multi-core workloads because both processors have the same turbo clock of 3.9 GHz which should be engaged during single and dual core workloads. On multi-core workloads the turbo needs to be disabled in order to maintain acceptable core temperatures and operating frequencies drop to base clock where the i7-4771 has a marginal 100 MHz or 2.9% advantage. In other words the two processors should be largely identical. Looking at the i7-4770 vs the i7-4771 benchmarks verifies this. Both the 4770 and 4771 are the current top end mainstream market leaders but for the vast majority of desktop users they are probably overkill as typical consumer use rarely requires more than two cores. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback